<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hockey Opinions&#187; NHL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyopinions.com/tag/nhl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyopinions.com</link>
	<description>Hockey Opinions and Debates from NHL Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:26:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2012 Stanley Cup Favourites</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/2012-stanley-cup-favourites/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/2012-stanley-cup-favourites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 19:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011-12]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Favourites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanley cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Boston Bruins have won the Cup, the entry draft has completed and free agent frenzy is winding to a halt.  The only place I can get my NHL fix is thinking about next season and which teams have the best shot at lifting the Stanley Cup.  I check out 5Dimes.com to see the Stanley [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Boston Bruins have won the Cup, the entry draft has completed and free agent frenzy is winding to a halt.  The only place I can get my NHL fix is thinking about next season and which teams have the best shot at lifting the Stanley Cup.  I check out <a title="5Dimes.com" href="http://www.nhlbettingtips.com/visit/5dimes/" target="_blank">5Dimes.com</a> to see the Stanley Cup odds for next season and it really got me thinking about which teams have a legit shot.  Here are a few teams I like to go far next season and who I will be placing wagers on because their odds are too good to pass up:</p>
<h3>Chicago Blackhawks @ +1500</h3>
<p>The Blackhawks are the 8th favourites to win the Stanley Cup next season and I personally have them slotted much higher.  I don&#8217;t necessarily think they will finish atop their division or even have home ice advantage in the first round of the playoffs, but the Blackhawks have the pieces in place to be a contender every year.  If they score the goal in overtime of game 7 against Vancouver this season I can guarantee that their odds would be closer to 10/1 right now.  People are quick to forget how a team played and instead just remember that they lost in the first round.  The Blackhawks have the top two lines in the NHL, with possibly the exception of San Jose, and their top defensemen are elite and will be hungry to get back to the top.  The loss of Brian Campbell will hurt this team more than most people think, but Nick Leddy is ready to step up with more ice time and Hjalmarsson should play better than he did last season when he let his play slip slightly.  The additions of Brunette, Carcillo and Mayers should bolster the teams depth and tenacity up front, but it really comes down to the fact that Kane, Toews, Hossa, Sharp and Bolland are just too good.  Corey Crawford is no slouch in goal either.  If the Blackhawks can get the best out of their players and add a bit more depth on defense they should have a very good chance to win the Cup this season.</p>
<h3>San Jose Sharks @ +1200</h3>
<p>The Sharks are the 6th rated team according to the oddsmakers.  They have made the Conference Finals two years in a row, but haven&#8217;t put up much of a fight at that stage.  The Sharks were just too slow and lacked the depth on defense both years.  The addition of Brent Burns should help the defense and take some of the responsibility away from Dan Boyle, while the Havlat for Heatley trade will bring more speed and and greater drive to win when it matters most.  The Sharks still have some positions open for depth forwards and they could do with adding a solid shutdown defenseman with speed.  Niemi is solid in goal, having already won a Stanley Cup, so it&#8217;s really the depth up front and the defensive d-men that this team is lacking in order to become a Stanley Cup Champion.  I have confidence that Doug Wilson will address these needs.  I&#8217;ve liked what he&#8217;s done so far this summer.</p>
<h3>For Those Interested&#8230;</h3>
<p>Here are the odds for the other 8 from the top 10 at 5Dimes.com.  Once it gets past them there really is no hope for finding a Cup Champion.</p>
<ul>
<li>Vancouver Canucks +675</li>
<li>Pittsburgh Penguins +850</li>
<li>Washington Capitals +1000</li>
<li>Boston Bruins +1100</li>
<li>Philadelphia Flyers +1100</li>
<li>Detroit Red Wings +1250</li>
<li>LA Kings +1700</li>
<li>Buffalo Sabres, Nashville Predators, Tampa Bay Lightning +2000 each</li>
</ul>
<p>**On an unrelated note a friend of mine is starting a <a href="http://spreads.org.uk/" target="_blank">Financial Spread Betting</a> website. Just wanted to give him a little shout out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/2012-stanley-cup-favourites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2011 NHL Draft Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/2011-nhl-draft-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/2011-nhl-draft-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Larsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gabriel Landeskog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan Nugent-Hopkins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=316</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Stanley Cup has been won the by the Boston Bruins and teams are already looking towards next season.  First on the docket for setting up a solid team for the future is the 2011 NHL entry draft, which is being held in Minnesota this season.  The consensus number one selection seems to be Ryan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Stanley Cup has been won the by the Boston Bruins and teams are already looking towards next season.  First on the docket for setting up a solid team for the future is the 2011 NHL entry draft, which is being held in Minnesota this season.  The consensus number one selection seems to be Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, but the next several picks are up in the air and anything can happen at an NHL entry draft as we have seen in the past.  Here are my predictions for the top 10 picks of the draft.</p>
<p><strong>1. Edmonton Oilers &#8211;&gt; Ryan Nugent-Hopkins</strong></p>
<p>Nugent-Hopkins seems to be the consensus number 1 for this draft.  He is not considered the most NHL ready, but his skill and vision have him pegged as having the most potential to be a superstar in the league.  The offensive upside is there, but he will have to put on a bit more weight and muscle before he should be ready to really contribute and compete in the NHL.  The Oilers are one of the few teams in the league that may have room for him on the top 2 lines right away with Gagner or Horcoff possibly moving to the wing.  But only expect him to play if he is receiving at least 15 minutes a game.</p>
<p><strong>2. Colorado Avalanche &#8211;&gt; Gabriel Landeskog</strong></p>
<p>The most NHL ready player in the draft will step right into the Avalanche lineup and help a very weak left wing corps where Cody McLeod is the top LW.  The forwards in Colorado are very poor and picking Landeskog is the easiest way for the Avs to move past the poor trade that sent Stewart and Shattenkirk to St. Louis for Eric Johnson and Jay McClement.  Landeskog is a fierce competitor who will likely become the captain of this team in the near future.</p>
<p><strong>3. Florida Panthers &#8211;&gt; Jonathan Huberdeau</strong></p>
<p>It&#8217;s between Huberdeau and Larsson for the Panthers and I think not making the playoffs with Bouwmeester then losing him for nothing will leave a sour taste in their mouth, which should cause the Panthers to steer clear of another highly touted defenseman.  The Panthers need a player who can fill the stands and help them score goals and Huberdeau should be that player in a year or two.  He needs to put on some weight, like Nugent-Hopkins, but he has the offensive upside and the vision to get the Panthers fans out of their seats.</p>
<p><strong>4. New Jersey Devils &#8211;&gt; Adam Larsson</strong></p>
<p>The Devils should be a force next year, but when you look at their defense the talent is lacking.  The Devils have a solid top two lines, however they were not able to score many goals last season (finishing last in the league by quite a margin).  The top d-man on the team only scored 23 points and in the speedy NHL today offense often starts from the back.  Larsson is poised with a strong break out pass that should help the Devils right away.</p>
<p><strong>5. New York Islanders &#8211;&gt; Dougie Hamilton</strong></p>
<p>The Islanders are very poor defensively and Hamilton is the perfect shut down d-man that should bring toughness and grit to their lineup.  The Islanders have to build their team and a solid defender that can log a lot of minutes and be on the plus side of even strength hockey is exactly what they need.</p>
<p><strong>6. Ottawa Senators &#8211;&gt; Sean Couturier</strong></p>
<p>The Senators are very dry up the middle after elite center Jason Spezza.  Mike Fisher must be replaced and if you look at their depth chart at the moment you will not be impressed with the names you see.  Couturier has dropped off from battling for the number one ranking earlier in the season, but he is a big body that is able to make plays and protect the puck.  He needs to work on his skating in order to make an impact in the NHL.</p>
<p><strong>7. Winnipeg Jets &#8211;&gt; Ryan Strome</strong></p>
<p>The Jets are in need of some additional skill in the middle of the ice.  They have solid wingers, but these players need a playmaking center to get them the puck.  I&#8217;m not saying Strome will make the team out of camp, but he has a legitimate chance and should go to the Jets this draft.</p>
<p><strong>8. Columbus Blue Jackets &#8211;&gt; Ryan Murphy</strong></p>
<p>Ryan Murphy is a smaller defenseman, but his offensive upside is huge and he possesses a wicked shot that should score him plenty of goals in the NHL, especially on the powerplay.  The Blue Jackets will jump to add an offensive d-man to their fairly unskilled backend.</p>
<p><strong>9. Boston Bruins &#8211;&gt; Mika Zibanejad</strong></p>
<p>This player has been playing with men in the Swedish Elite League and he has not looked like a boy among men.  He should transform into a solid NHL power forward and this fits in perfectly with the Boston Bruins style of play.</p>
<p><strong>10. Minnesota Wild &#8211;&gt; Nathan Beulieu</strong></p>
<p>Beulieu will be the best player left in the draft at the 10th position and you can expect the Wild to scoop him up here.  Nathan is a strong puck moving defensemen that will be an elite powerplay quarterback, but he will need a few years to make the jump.  The Wild have a fairly strong team so they will not need to push anybody into the lineup right away.</p>
<p>The draft should be interesting and there should be some odds up soon.  If I see betting odds up as to which player will go first overall I will post them on this article.</p>
<p>But for now it&#8217;s back to watching Wimbledon for me.  I placed a <a href="http://www.onlinetennisbetting.com/roger-federer/" target="_blank">bet on Roger Federer</a> to take the Championships this year and he looked very good in his opening match today.  I&#8217;m getting more into tennis betting and if this interests you I suggest you check out my other website, <a href="http://www.onlinetennisbetting.com" target="_blank">www.OnlineTennisBetting.com</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/2011-nhl-draft-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL.com Not Working &#8211; Hacked to Display an Advertisement</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-com-not-working-hacked-to-display-an-advertisement/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-com-not-working-hacked-to-display-an-advertisement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 18:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertisement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Banner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today as I was doing my usual check on NHL.com (which happens about every fifteen minutes) I noticed a very strange thing.  The website redirected me to a page with just a banner advertisement in the top left corner.  As I was trying to get back to nhl.com to check out the previews of tonights [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today as I was doing my usual check on <a href="http://www.nhl.com">NHL.com</a> (which happens about every fifteen minutes) I noticed a very strange thing.  The website redirected me to a page with just a banner advertisement in the top left corner.  As I was trying to get back to nhl.com to check out the previews of tonights game the same redirect kept occuring.  I thought this was strange, so I asked a few friends online if it was doing the same for them and it was.  The only thing I can come up with is that <a href="http://www.nhl.com" target="_blank">NHL.com</a> has been hacked and every click on that banner advertisement is making the hacker a few cents.  I&#8217;m sure this will be fixed quickly and taken care of, but it is surprising to think that NHL.com does not have a better online security system to prevent these sort of attacks.</p>
<p>Let me know in the comments if you are experiencing the same thing when attempting to visit the <a href="http://www.nhl.com" target="_blank">NHL website</a>.  Most of the ads I have seen are NHL related with many pointing the NHL shop, or to purchase NHL tickets or even just to the NHL network subscription.  The ad displayed may be similar to the one below:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
 google_ad_client = "ca-pub-4359649214328238"; /* HockeyOpinions2 */ google_ad_slot = "7296697225"; google_ad_width = 468; google_ad_height = 60;
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
<script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type="text/javascript">
</script></p>
<p>In the meantime a good alternative to NHL.com in terms of hockey information and statistics is the <a href="http://www.tsn.ca" target="_blank">TSN website</a>.</p>
<p>**EDIT &#8211; NHL.com is now working!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-com-not-working-hacked-to-display-an-advertisement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why The New Jersey Devils WILL Make the Playoffs</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/why-the-new-jersey-devils-will-make-the-playoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/why-the-new-jersey-devils-will-make-the-playoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Devils are on a remarkable 20-2-2 run, which begs the question: Can they keep this up and make history by making the playoffs?  They have 17 games remaining and are currently sitting 8 points out of the 8th and final playoff spot in the Eastern Conference.  They are in 12th, which means there are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Devils are on a remarkable 20-2-2 run, which begs the question: Can they keep this up and make history by making the playoffs?  They have 17 games remaining and are currently sitting 8 points out of the 8th and final playoff spot in the Eastern Conference.  They are in 12th, which means there are teams in front of them who are also battling for that final spot.  Actually, there are really 4 teams fighting for the final two spots in the East.  They are as follows:</p>
<p>New York Rangers 74 points with 14 games remaining<br />
Buffalo Sabres 72 points with 17 games remaining<br />
Carolina Hurricanes 71 points with 16 games remaining<br />
Toronto Maple Leafs 67 points with 16 games remaining</p>
<p>Then you have the Atlanta Thrashers, but you can basically dismiss them because they have been playing so poorly of late that they really stand no chance.  But now you also have to add a fifth team.  That being the New Jersey Devils:</p>
<p>New Jersey Devils 64 points with 17 games remaining</p>
<p>24 games ago the Devils were 27 points out of the playoffs.  Now after going 20-2-2 the team finds themselves only 8 points back.  If they were to make the playoffs they would make history as the team that came from the furthest amount of points back from the playoffs to turn their season around and make the postseason.  This record would likely never be broken.</p>
<h3>What Do They Have To Do?</h3>
<p>Let&#8217;s take a look at the two teams they are chasing.  If you use each contending teams point percentage to this point in the season and assume that they will continue at this pace we can figure out how many points the Devils may need to pass these teams.</p>
<p>The New York Rangers earn an average of (74/68 = 1.088) points per game they play, which means they will finish the season with ~89 points.<br />
The Sabres have more games in hand and will finish the season with ~91 points.</p>
<p>This means the Rangers will be more likely to be caught and if these two teams maintain their current winning percentages the Devils will need 89 points to make the playoffs (because the Devils would own the tie breaker having won more games in regulation or overtime).</p>
<p>Therefore, in their final 17 games if the Devils go something like (12-4-1) they will achieve this 89 point objective.  But to be more certain of making the playoffs (any of the four teams ahead of them could also get hot and push up the magic number to gain playoff entry) the Devils may need to go around (13-2-2) for 92 points.  This is a very difficult pace to maintain, but looking at their schedule the Devils play 5 very winnable games, which could put them right in the thick of things.  The Devils play the struggling Thrashers and Senators twice, and the not struggling, but still very beatable Islanders once.  If they can come out of these 5 games with 10 points (very possible considering their current streak along with each of these teams abilities) the Devils will likely only be around 4 points out of 8th position.  From then on they will hold more of their fate because they have a game against the Sabres remaining and a game against the Rangers in their 81st game of the season, which could very well determine their playoff fate.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a believer&#8230;.are you?</p>
<p><em>**In other betting news, namely horse racing you will be able to place <a href="http://www.betgrandnational.net" target="_blank">Grand National bets</a> very soon on the upcoming April 9th race (coincidentally the same day the Rangers vs Devils matchup takes place).  <a href="http://www.betonkentuckyderby.org/" target="_blank">Kentucky Derby betting</a> will also start to heat up soon for the May 7th race.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/why-the-new-jersey-devils-will-make-the-playoffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Eastern Conference Division Winner Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-eastern-conference-division-winner-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-eastern-conference-division-winner-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 19:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[division winner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Capitals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find NHL futures predictions take the most skill to make because there is much less luck involved when the outcome is decided over a long period of time, in this case an 82 game series.  In this post I decided to incorporate the division winner odds I found at Bodog.com in order to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find NHL futures predictions take the most skill to make because there is much less luck involved when the outcome is decided over a long period of time, in this case an 82 game series.  In this post I decided to incorporate the division winner odds I found at <a href="http://www.sportsbetlistings.com/visit/bodog/" target="_blank"><strong>Bodog.com</strong></a> in order to make more <a href="http://www.sportsbetlistings.com/sports-betting-news/" target="_blank">sports betting predictions</a> against the odds.  Luckily for me the team I thought would win the first two divisions happened to be the underdog anyways.  If you want to learn more about <a href="http://www.sportsbetlistings.com/sports-betting-odds/" target="_blank">sports betting odds</a>, click the link for a great site with tons of info.</p>
<h3>Northeast Division</h3>
<p>The Northeast division is in my opinion the tightest, most well rounded division in the NHL.  There are no great teams and if you take out the Maple Leafs there are no horrible teams.  This year I expect the Maple Leafs to do much better, which should increase the toughness of the Northeast Division.  Last year Buffalo came out of nowhere to win the division and this year they are the second most likeliest win according to oddsmakers.  In my opinion only Boston, Buffalo and Ottawa have any shot at taking home this division title.  Here are the odds:</p>
<p>Boston Bruins EV<br />
Buffalo Sabres +275<br />
<a href="http://www.sportsbetlistings.com/visit/bodog/" target="_blank"><strong>Ottawa Senators +400</strong></a><br />
Montreal Canadiens +500<br />
Toronto Maple Leafs +1500</p>
<p>With these odds I&#8217;m taking the Ottawa Senators any day.  The Sens should once again improve on a solid outting last year and compete throughout the season for the Northeast division title.  It will come down to the last few games between the top three teams, but I think Ottawa should have the depth to win the Northeast this year.</p>
<h3>Atlantic Division</h3>
<p>The Atlantic is another tough division to call with the Devils, Penguins and Flyers all be strong contenders within the division.  The Penguins and Flyers each have the talent and potential to win the division, but neither team has really strung together an entire 82 game season with consistency.  The Devils on the other hand seem to always overachieve when it comes to the regular season.  With the addition of Kovalchuk the Devils should be able to repeat as Atlantic division champs.  Here are the odds:</p>
<p>Pittsburgh Penguins -125<br />
<a href="http://www.sportsbetlistings.com/visit/bodog/" target="_blank"><strong>New Jersey Devils +175</strong></a><br />
Philadelphia Flyers +350<br />
New York Rangers +1500<br />
New York Islanders +2500</p>
<h3>Southeast Division</h3>
<p>The worst division in the NHL, now somehow contains the best regular season team in hockey.  The Washington Capitals have a star studded line-up that won the Presidents trophy last year and should be able to repeat as both the regular season league champ and easily the Southeast division champion.  The Tampa Bay Lightning are the only team in the division with an outside chance of taking the crown from the Caps and that&#8217;s only because we are currently unsure of how all of their offseason moves with translate onto the ice.  No matter what the odds you have to go with the Capitals because they will win this division 95% of the time!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sportsbetlistings.com/visit/bodog/" target="_blank"><strong>Washington Capitals -400</strong></a><br />
Tampa Bay Lightning +700<br />
Carolina Hurricanes +1200<br />
Atlanta Thrashers +1500<br />
Florida Panthers +2000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-eastern-conference-division-winner-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 1 NHL Playoff Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1-nhl-playoff-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1-nhl-playoff-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[round one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to be a quick post stating my first round NHL playoff predictions.  The run to the Stanley Cup begins tomorrow so it&#8217;s an exciting time of year for hockey fans everywhere.  I&#8217;m not sure if you remember, but last year I went 8 for 8 in the first round of the playoffs, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a quick post stating my first round NHL playoff predictions.  The run to the Stanley Cup begins tomorrow so it&#8217;s an exciting time of year for hockey fans everywhere.  I&#8217;m not sure if you remember, but last year I went 8 for 8 in the first round of the playoffs, which included upsets such as Anaheim over the Sharks and the Hurricanes over the Devils.  This year I hope to do the same, but my first round predictions don&#8217;t include as many big upsets.  Check them out below:</p>
<p><a href="http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-first-round-playoff-predictions-2010-11/" target="_self">Get the 2010-11 NHL First Round Predictions here.</a></p>
<h3>Eastern Conference Predictions</h3>
<p>(1) Washington Capitals -650<br />
(8) Montreal Canadiens +425</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Washington Capitals in 5.</strong></p>
<p>(2) New Jersey Devils -235<br />
(7) Philadelphia Flyers +195</p>
<p><strong>Winner: New Jersey Devils in 6.</strong></p>
<p>(3) Buffalo Sabres -170<br />
(6) Boston Bruins +150</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Boston Bruins in 6.</strong></p>
<p>(4) Pittsburgh Penguins -280<br />
(5) Ottawa Senators +240</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Pittsburgh Penguins in 6.</strong></p>
<h3>Western Conference Predictions</h3>
<p>(1) San Jose Sharks -450<br />
(8) Colorado Avalanche +325</p>
<p><strong>Winner: San Jose Sharks in 4.</strong></p>
<p>(2) Chicago Blackhawks -450<br />
(7) Nashville Predators +325</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Chicago Blackhawks in 6.</strong></p>
<p>(3) Vancouver Canucks -245<br />
(6) Los Angeles Kings +205</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Vancouver Canucks in 5.</strong></p>
<p>(4) Phoenix Coyotes +165<br />
(5) Detroit Red Wings -190</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Detroit Red Wings in 7.</strong></p>
<p>If you like <a href="http://www.icehockeybetting.org" target="_blank">hockey betting</a> then I would suggest signing up at <a href="http://www.bookmaker.com/?cmpid=9808_746" target="_blank">Bookmaker.com</a>.  They will have <a href="http://www.nhlodds.org/nhl-playoffs-first-round-betting-odds/">NHL playoff first round odds</a> for every series so you can place as many bets as you&#8217;d like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1-nhl-playoff-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teams Cannot Afford to Fall Behind in New NHL</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/teams-cannot-afford-to-fall-behind-in-new-nhl/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/teams-cannot-afford-to-fall-behind-in-new-nhl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Maple Leafs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is still very early in the NHL regular season, but teams that are falling behind now are quickly putting themselves out of playoff contention.  With the parody in the league these days and the extra overtime/shootout points teams that fall behind early in the season really put themselves up against the wall in terms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is still very early in the NHL regular season, but teams that are falling behind now are quickly putting themselves out of playoff contention.  With the parody in the league these days and the extra overtime/shootout points teams that fall behind early in the season really put themselves up against the wall in terms of coming from behind and grabbing a playoff spot.  I saw it last year with my Ottawa Senators.  The Sens started off slow and then they were fighting a losing battle all year long.  Even a huge three week span to start March where the Sens earned 18 of a possible 22 points didn&#8217;t event put the Senators within a reasonable striking distance of a playoff birth.  I&#8217;m writing this article because I keep hearing fans of teams low in the standings talking about how their team has a legitimate shot at the playoffs.  It&#8217;s getting to that time of year where teams are already finding themselves out of the hunt.</p>
<p>Take the Toronto Maple Leafs for example.  Leaf fans are the worst.  Most of them probably still think their team is going to win the Stanley Cup this year.  The will say things like, &#8220;we are just 7 points out of the playoffs.  That&#8217;s just four wins.&#8221;  But the truth is that&#8217;s four wins for the Leafs, four losses for the 8th place team, three losses for the ninth, tenth and eleventh place teams, and two losses for the 12th placed team.  That equals out to 19 games having to go as planned, and a lot of the time that&#8217;s just not possible because these teams that have to lose will likely be playing each other.  Not to mention that these losses have to be in regulation.  The extra point makes it even more difficult for teams to come from behind to make playoffs because even when teams ahead of them are losing they will still be receiving a single point many of these times.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at this logically.  I think even fans making these outrageous <a href="http://www.nhlpredictions.org/" target="_blank">NHL predictions</a> in favour of their favourite team can agree that a playoff team needs 90 points at an absolute minimum.  The average of the two 8th placed teams last season was 92 so we will use that number to make our following calculations.  The Maple Leafs currently have 25 points in 29 games.  This means that they need to earn, at an absolute minimum, 67 points in their remaining 53 games.  That is an average of 1.265 points per game.  So far this season, only the top 6 teams in the league have a point % greater than 1.265.  To put it into perspective at an absolute minimum, the Leafs would have to win about 31 of their last 53 games, lose 17 in regulation and lose 5 in OT/SO.  Does anyone really think the Maple Leafs can be a top 6 NHL team for the last two-thirds of the season?  I certainly don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Once a team falls behind in this new NHL where the teams are all very equal and many games award the loser a point it is very difficult to make up any ground.  The games at this time of year are extremely important, so if your team is starting to fall off the pace, I advise you to treat every game like it&#8217;s the playoffs and watch it intently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/teams-cannot-afford-to-fall-behind-in-new-nhl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mikko Koivu is a 70+ Point Center</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/mikko-koivu-is-a-70-point-center/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/mikko-koivu-is-a-70-point-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mikko Koivu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mikko Koivu is the younger brother of Saku Koivu and currently the top player on the struggling Minnesota Wild.  Me and a buddy were arguing recently about whether Koivu is a keeper in our hockey pool.  I say he is a definite keeper because he will get between 70 and 80 points for the next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikko Koivu is the younger brother of Saku Koivu and currently the top player on the struggling Minnesota Wild.  Me and a buddy were arguing recently about whether Koivu is a keeper in our hockey pool.  I say he is a definite keeper because he will get between 70 and 80 points for the next several season, while my buddy says he is only a 60 point guy.</p>
<p>Koivu has been improving ever since he entered the NHL leading up to his 67 point performance last season over 79 games.  This season he already has 16 points in 17 games, which means he is on pace for 77 points.  Not to mention he has been doing this on a struggling Minnesota Wild team that is 5th worst in the league in goals per game.  The Wild are starting to pick up their game and perform closer to their potential, which is battling for the final playoff spot in the West.  When the team gets going, you can expet Koivu to at least match his current production if not increase it.</p>
<p>Mikko plays in all situations for the Wild and averages around 19 minutes a game, which is a very good amount for a forward in the NHL.  He is on the first powerplay unit and will be played in all key situations when the team needs goals.  Koivu was recently named the captain of the team and so far he has handled this responsibility extremely well and his production and the teams improvement are both proof of this.</p>
<p>I consider Mikko one of the top 10 centers in the game and I&#8217;m sure he will be a force for Finland at the Olympics this winter.  Finland doesn&#8217;t have great odds when it comes to <a href="http://www.winterolympicsbetting.com" target="_blank">winter olympics betting</a>, but they definitely have a shot with Koivu leading them.  You can bet on Finland or any other team at BetCRIS.  Just make sure you use a <a href="http://www.betcrisbonuscode.net/" target="_blank">BetCRIS bonus code</a> when signing up in order to receive the best initial deposit bonus available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/mikko-koivu-is-a-70-point-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL 2008-2009 Standings Using 3-Point System</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-2008-2009-standings-using-3-point-system/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-2008-2009-standings-using-3-point-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-point system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL point system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL standings 08-09]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a big believer in the NHL switching over to a 3-point system that awards 3 points for regulation wins, 2 points for overtime/shootout wins, 1 point for overtime/shootout losses and nothing for regulation losses. I feel that the current system of awarding 2 points some games and 3 points others is completely ridiculous because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big believer in the NHL switching over to a 3-point system that awards 3 points for regulation wins, 2 points for overtime/shootout wins, 1 point for overtime/shootout losses and nothing for regulation losses.</p>
<p>I feel that the current system of awarding 2 points some games and 3 points others is completely ridiculous because it encourages regulation ties and makes it difficult for teams to gain any ground in the standings during the playoff races.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be adding a detailed article outline why I think the NHL should make the switch to the 3-point system in the near future.  In the mean time I have done some research and analyzed how the standings would have looked last year had the 3-point system been used:</p>
<h2>Eastern Conference</h2>
<h2>Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-180 aligncenter" title="Eastern Conference Standings" src="http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Eastern-Conference-Standings.jpg" alt="Eastern Conference Standings" width="361" height="375" /></p>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 392pt;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="522">
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="5" width="64"></col>
<col style="width: 56pt;" width="74"></col>
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="2" width="64"></col>
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt; width: 48pt;" width="64" height="20"></td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Team</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">GP</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Wins</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">OT Wins</td>
<td style="width: 56pt;" width="74">OT Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Points</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">1</td>
<td>Boston</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">46</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">19</td>
<td align="right">162</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">2</td>
<td>Washington</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">40</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">148</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">3</td>
<td>New Jersey</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">37</td>
<td align="right">14</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">27</td>
<td align="right">143</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">4</td>
<td>Philadelphia</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">34</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">27</td>
<td align="right">133</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">5</td>
<td>Carolina</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">132</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">6</td>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">28</td>
<td align="right">132</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">7</td>
<td>Florida</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">34</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">127</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">8</td>
<td>New York Rangers</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">13</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">125</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">9</td>
<td>Montreal</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">123</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">10</td>
<td>Buffalo</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right">122</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">11</td>
<td>Ottawa</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">29</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">112</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">12</td>
<td>Toronto</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">13</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">105</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">13</td>
<td>Atlanta</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">41</td>
<td align="right">100</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">14</td>
<td>Tampa Bay</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">19</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">18</td>
<td align="right">40</td>
<td align="right">85</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">15</td>
<td>New York Islanders</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">20</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">47</td>
<td align="right">81</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see using the 3-point system would have made some significant changes in the Eastern Conference.  Most notably, the Florida Panthers would have finished seventh with 127 points, passing the New York Rangers and pushing the Montreal Canadiens out of the playoffs.  The Habs played 22 overtime/shootout games in 08-09 and this played a major role in allowing them to sneak into the 8th playoff spot in the East.  Another change would be the Penguins falling from 4th to 6th position.  This would have meant that the Penguins play the New Jersey Devils in the first round of the playoffs, which could have caused the entire Stanley Cup run to play out differently.  Most people would agree at the Panthers deserved to be in the playoffs and likely would have put up more of a fight than the Canadiens.</p>
<h2>Western Conference</h2>
<h2>Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-181" title="Western Conference" src="http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Western-Conference.jpg" alt="Western Conference" width="366" height="378" /></p>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 392pt;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="522">
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="5" width="64"></col>
<col style="width: 56pt;" width="74"></col>
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="2" width="64"></col>
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt; width: 48pt;" width="64" height="20"></td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64"></td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">GP</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Wins</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">OT Wins</td>
<td style="width: 56pt;" width="74">OT Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Points</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">1</td>
<td>San Jose</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">44</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">18</td>
<td align="right">161</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">2</td>
<td>Detroit</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">42</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">21</td>
<td align="right">154</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">3</td>
<td>Calgary</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">40</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">138</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">4</td>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">36</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">140</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">5</td>
<td>Vancouver</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">37</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">27</td>
<td align="right">137</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">6</td>
<td>St. Louis</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">123</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">7</td>
<td>Columbus</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">123</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">8</td>
<td>Minnesota</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">122</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">9</td>
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">121</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">10</td>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">28</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">34</td>
<td align="right">116</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">11</td>
<td>Edmonton</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">116</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">12</td>
<td>Phoenix</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">39</td>
<td align="right">111</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">13</td>
<td>Dallas</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">25</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">108</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">14</td>
<td>Los Angeles</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">26</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">37</td>
<td align="right">105</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">15</td>
<td>Colorado</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">20</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">45</td>
<td align="right">89</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Using the 3-point system, the Minnesota Wild would have squeaked into the 8th place spot and the Anaheim Mighty Ducks would have missed the playoffs but 1 point.  If that&#8217;s not a good race then I don&#8217;t know what is.  Sixth through ninth in the West has only a 2 point difference in the West.  This was a 4 point difference using the current system and it&#8217;s much more difficult to make up points the way points are currently allotted.  So there goes the argument that the playoff races would be less exciting with the 3-point system.  Both Nashville and Edmonton would have been in it right to the end as well with 116 points a piece.  The only other change the 3-point system would have made is Calgary and Vancouver switching places (but they would both have likely still lost to Havlat and the &#8216;Hawks anyways <img src='http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>As you can see the 3-point system isn&#8217;t going to drastically change the standings.  However, it is the fairer way to award points and the slight differences would have been huge for both Florida and Minnesota who really each deserved to be in the playoffs based on their records.  Minnesota played in 3 less overtime games than the Ducks and Florida played in 4 fewer OT games than the Habs.  The current NHL point system is supposedly rewarding competition, but in reality it is rewarding mediocrity.  The teams that play for a tie are rewarded, while the teams that play for the win are penalized.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for now.  I&#8217;ll have another post on this topic within the few days outlining why the NHL should switch to the 3-point system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-2008-2009-standings-using-3-point-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Regular Season Predictions &#8211; 09/10</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-regular-season-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-regular-season-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane Zurbrigg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anaheim Ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Thrashers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Sabres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary Flames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Avalanche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus Blue Jackets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton Oilers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal Canadiens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nashville Predators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Islanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Flyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix Coyotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose Sharks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Blues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Lightning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Maple Leafs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Canucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Capitals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[East The Contenders 1. Pittsburgh Penguins I see no reason why the Penguins won’t follow up on last year’s Stanley Cup win with another very good regular season. Crosby and Malkin will be as good as ever, if not better. As well, though Fleury has taken a fair bit of criticism in the past, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>East</h1>
<h2>The Contenders</h2>
<p>1. Pittsburgh Penguins</p>
<p>I see no reason why the Penguins won’t follow up on last year’s Stanley Cup win with another very good regular season. Crosby and Malkin will be as good as ever, if not better. As well, though Fleury has taken a fair bit of criticism in the past, I think that the Cup win really cemented some of the confidence that he’s been building, and I’d expect an excellent campaign out of him. The Penguin’s defense, led by Sergei Gonchar and Brooks Orpik, isn’t exceptionally good, but it’ll get the job done. Crosby and Malkin are too competitive to be complacent after their Cup win, and they’ll help the team avoid the typical &#8216;Cup hangover’.</p>
<p>2. Washington Capitals</p>
<p>The Capitals are full of young talent that’s only getting better, and they will seriously challenge the Penguins for the Eastern Conference Title this year. Expect another amazing year from Ovechkin, and if his supporting cast steps up and Varlamov proves to be a solid NHL netminder, this team has a good shot at the Cup. Certainly, big years are needed and expected from Mike Green and Alexander Semin, and that should give the Capitals one of the most explosive offenses in the league.</p>
<p>3. Boston Bruins</p>
<p>The best defensive team in the league last year, the Bruins should excel at the defensive end again this year. As well, though Tim Thomas may regress slightly from his Vezina form of last year, he still figures to be one of the NHL’s best goalies. The Bruins won’t score a ton of goals, but the forward corps, led by Marc Savard, Milan Lucic and David Krejci, will be good enough for the stingy Bruins to stay among the league’s elite teams.</p>
<p>4. Philadelphia Flyers</p>
<p>The Flyers, full of good young talent including Mike Richards and Jeff Carter, should be among the East’s best teams. However, they’ll be caught behind the Penguins in the Atlantic and will thus have to settle for 4<sup>th</sup> in the East. Chris Pronger will shore up a solid defense and provide leadership, pushing the Flyers into the mix for the East Crown. However, the Flyers will be relying on Ray Emery in net, and that’s always a risky proposition. Until they solidify their goaltending situation, the Flyers will have difficulties matching up with the beasts of the East &#8211; Boston, Pittsburgh and Washington.</p>
<h2>The Pretenders</h2>
<p>5. New Jersey Devils</p>
<p>I was torn over what to do with the Devils. Every year they are expected to crumble in the face of off-season losses, yet they always manage to contend in the Eastern Conference, though playoff success has eluded them for the past few years. Without some major changes, the end is nearing for this Devils team, as successful as it has been for the past decade. Nonetheless, they’ll play excellent defensive hockey in front of Brodeur this year, and they’ll manage to make the playoffs, though they won’t be putting pressure on the East’s elite.</p>
<p>6. Carolina Hurricanes</p>
<p>The Hurricanes, after last year’s surprising run to the Eastern Finals, will be good again this year. Led by Eric Staal and backed by Cam Ward, expect the ‘Canes to put together a solid, if unspectacular, season. Unfortunately, they’re simply not quite as good as the Penguins, Bruins and Capitals, and they&#8217;re going to have a hard time duplicating last year’s playoff success.</p>
<p>7. Toronto Maple Leafs</p>
<p>Brian Burke has his fingerprints all over this team, and the resulting ‘Bay Street Bullies’ are an odd team. Though they lack star power up front, they still managed to finish 10<sup>th</sup> in the NHL in scoring last year, and Phil Kessel will only make this forward unit better. The worst defensive team in the league last year, they figure to be far better in 09/10 with the additions of Beauchemin and Komisarek, in particular. Goaltending will make or break this team – Vesa Toskala was awful last year, and if he’s in better form this year, backed up by Jonas Gustavsson, then the Leafs should have some success. I think the tandem will be respectable, and the Leafs should squeak into the playoffs. However, this is still a mediocre hockey team that has a long way to go before any Cup parades should be planned.</p>
<p>8. Montreal Canadiens</p>
<p>The Habs look rather different from the team swept out of the first round by the Bruins last year. Though they’ll miss Kovalev, Mike Cammalleri will be a more-than-adequate, if less flashy, replacement. Scott Gomez is a risky acquisition, and I would be very surprised if he lived up to his rather large contract. Offense wasn’t an issue last year though, and it won’t be this year. Komisarek will be missed, and aside from Andre Markov, the team’s defense will not be its strongest point. Carey Price should be solid, which will reinforce the team’s weak defense. The Habs are flawed, but they should make the playoffs, though a deep run is not in the cards.</p>
<p>9. Ottawa Senators</p>
<p>The Sens are a difficult team to figure out. Losing Dany Heatley will hurt, but Bryan Murray, considering the circumstances, did net a decent return in exchange for the disgruntled star. Jonathan Cheechoo was a throw-in in the deal; It is Milan Michalek who the Sens really wanted, and rightfully so. Young and skilled, Michalek should be a big asset to the team for years to come. The Sens’ offense should be far more balanced than it has in the past decade, making it for more difficult on opposing teams to shut them down. If Pascal Leclaire is the solid goalie the Sens have long been looking for, then expect the Senators to be back in the playoffs this year. Though I have them barely missing the playoffs, they could easily finish as high as 5<sup>th</sup> in the conference.</p>
<p>10. Buffalo Sabres</p>
<p>The Sabres did little this offseason, and will in all likelihood miss the playoffs like they did last year. There’s a shortage of talent up front here, even if first line centre Tim Connolly is healthy. Thomas Vanek will have to be brilliant offensively to keep the team afloat. Ryan Miller should be solid in net, as always. Losing Jaroslav Spacek to the Canadiens, though, will hurt the weak Sabres’ D. The Sabres will be in playoff contention, but will probably end up watching the playoff dance.</p>
<p>11. New York Rangers</p>
<p>The Rangers will be solid this year, but without a healthy Marian Gaborik this team is short on skill, and will probably miss the playoffs. When healthy, Gaborik is one of the game’s premier scorers. However, staying healthy has been a huge issue for the star, and I would be very surprised to see him play more than 70 games. The Rangers were awful last year offensively, and that doesn’t figure to change this year, even if they play aggressive John Tortorella-style hockey. Henrik Lundqvist will be good, as always, but even he can only do so much.</p>
<p>12. Florida Panthers</p>
<p>After almost squeaking into the playoffs last year, the Panthers seem due to disappoint this year. Despite the best efforts of sophomore coach Peter DeBoer, I just don’t see enough talent on this roster for them to stay ahead of the teams above and earn a playoff spot. They won’t be awful like the teams below them, but the playoffs are a stretch, barring significant improvement from players such as Nathan Horton and Stephen Weiss, both of whom were once though to be premier prospects but have failed to live up to expectations.</p>
<h2>The Hopeless</h2>
<p>13. Tampa Bay Lightning</p>
<p>Some are predicting a playoff berth is in order for the Lightning this year, but I don’t see it happening. Bringing in Ohlund from Vancouver was a good move, and Victor Hedman should be able to step in and be a capable player from the start, which will bolster their blueline. They’ve got plenty of talent up front in Vinny Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis and the emerging Steven Stamkos. Nonetheless, I’m not sold on Mike Smith as a solid NHL number one goalie, and I lack faith in the abilities of Rich Tocchet. I’d be surprised if the Lightning put it all together like many predict they will. I expect that they’ll be a mess and end up near the East’s basement again.</p>
<p>14. New York Islanders</p>
<p>I have no idea what GM Garth Snow is doing with this team. Backing up Rick DiPietro with one of either Martin Biron or Dwayne Roloson might not have been a bad idea, but bringing both in is a rather strange move. Tavares will bolster a weak Isles’ offense, but he won’t be enough. Goals will be at a premium in Long Island this year. There’s little to be excited about defensively, too. On the whole, this simply isn’t a particularly talented roster, and the Isles have a long way to go before they can even think about the playoffs.</p>
<p>15. Atlanta Thrashers</p>
<p>The Thrashers have never won a playoff game. Don’t expect that to change this year. It’ll be a messy, messy year in Atlanta, and look for Ilya Kovalchuk’s imprending free agency to overshadow whatever the Thrashers are doing on the ice. That might not be a bad thing, though, as the Thrashers will be brutal this year. Former Leafs Pavel Kubina and Nik Antropov are solid additions, and underrated Bryan Little should have another good year. Kovalchuk should produce huge numbers, as he’s playing for a new contract, and he’ll be an explosive offensive force, as always. Nonetheless, there’s a lack of depth on the roster, and a big hole in net. Kari Lehtonen simply hasn’t proven himself to be a particularly good goaltender, and I’d be surprised if he suddenly put it together this year. He’s got a young defense in front of him, too, and that means that a lot of pucks are going to end up in Atlanta’s net. Expect another bad year for the Thrashers, on and off the ice.</p>
<h1>West<span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 13px;"> </span></h1>
<h2>The Contenders</h2>
<p>1. Detroit Red Wings</p>
<p>The Wings will miss Hossa and Hudler, but this team is still far too talented to slip much. Zetterberg and Datsyuk are two of the league’s best offensive players, they still have Lidstrom and Rafalski on the blueline, and Osgood will be strong in the crease. The Wings’ core is one of the best in the league, and there’s no reason to think that they won’t be once again competing for the President’s Trophy.</p>
<p>2. San Jose Sharks</p>
<p>Heatley and Thornton will be phenomenal together. Heatley should be a 50 goal scorer again, and Thornton should get back to scoring 100+ points. Though perhaps not the best leader, Patrick Marleau will still provide lots of secondary scoring, and the Sharks will be an offensive powerhouse. The ageless Rob Blake and Dan Boyle lead a capable Sharks defensive corps, and Evgeni Nabokov should be solid in net. The Sharks are no strangers to regular season success, but the playoffs are a different story. Questions about tenacity and leadership will continue to plague the team, but they’ll post a solid regular season record, though it remains to be seen whether the team can win when it counts.</p>
<p>3. Vancouver Canucks</p>
<p>The Flames will challenge the Canucks for the Northwest Division lead, but I expect the ‘Nucks to pull it out. Captain Roberto Luongo should bounce back from the shelling he took in Vancouver’s season-ending loss to the Blackhawks in the 2<sup>nd</sup> round last year. In front of him is a solid if unspectacular defense, only made better by the addition of Mathieu Schneider. Up front they lack the star power of other contenders, but the Sedin twins lead a solid contingent of forwards that will get the job done. The Canucks are one of the West’s best teams, but I think that they still need to add one elite player to put them over the top.</p>
<p>4. Chicago Blackhawks</p>
<p>The Blackhawks are young and extremely talented. Adding Hossa to an already excellent offense makes them one of the league’s best offensive teams, and they’ll score a ton of goals. The team’s defense is also among the league’s best, led by criminally underrated Duncan Keith, who has Brian Campbell, Brent Seabrook and Cam Barker with him on the blueline. The only question mark facing the ‘Hawks is in the crease. Is Cristobal Huet good enough to be Chicago’s unquestioned number one goalie? I don’t think so. Expect the Hawks to be extremely good, but the lack of a proven goaltender prevents the team from being a favourite to win the Cup.</p>
<p>5. Calgary Flames</p>
<p>Led by one of hockey’s best, Jarome Iginla, the Flames figure to be among the West’s best teams. The loss of Mike Cammalleri will hurt on offense, but the team does have enough scoring to get by. Olli Jokinen needs to step up and get back to being a point-per-game player for the Flames to really be a threat. Adding Jay Bouwmeester gives the Flames one of the league’s best defenses, and that can only help Kiprusoff. The Flames will be extremely stingy. All this adds up to an excellent season, and I think the Flames will also make noise in the playoffs this year.</p>
<h2><strong>The Pretenders</strong></h2>
<p>6. Anaheim Ducks</p>
<p>The Ducks took an excellent San Jose squad out of the playoff picture last year, and their tough style of play will once again lead to success this year. Getzlaf, Perry and Teemu Selanne lead a solid offense. The loss of Chris Pronger leaves a big hole on the Ducks blueline, but the addition of Ryan Whitney will certainly help fill that hole, and the team will still be good defensively.The goaltending situation is a little dicey in Anaheim – who will be the team’s #1, Jonas Hiller or Jean-Sebastian Giguere? Hiller was the better goalie last year, and was excellent in the playoffs. I’d expect the two to split the load until one or the other asserts himself as the clearcut number one, at which point the other will probably be traded, as there’s always a market for good goalies.</p>
<p>7. Minnesota Wild</p>
<p>This isn’t the most talented roster in the world, but the Wild play a damn good team game and will most likely sneak into the playoffs in a tight race. Havlat will give the team a boost on offense, though the team still won’t score a ton of goals. Nonetheless, their solid defense and goaltending will keep them in most games, which means that the offense doesn’t have to be spectacular. They won’t be competing for the West title, but a playoff appearance is likely.</p>
<p>8. Los Angeles Kings</p>
<p>The Kings, after a long, long stretch of terrible hockey, appear poised to finally begin contending again. The addition of solid veterans like playoff hero Rob Scuderi and ‘Captain Canada’ Ryan Smyth will strengthen a roster filled with young talent. Anze Kopitar, Alexander Frolov and Dustin Brown will lead an explosive Kings offense. Questions remain about the team’s overall defensive ability, and the team is relying on Jonathan Bernier to emerge as a bonafide NHL #1 goalie. I think it should all come together for the Kings, and they should find themselves playing playoff hockey for the first time in six seasons.</p>
<p>9. St. Louis Blues</p>
<p>After a surprising playoff appearance last year, the Blues will compete for a playoff spot again this year. I think they’ll miss out, but it’ll be tight. The offense should be good, led by Paul Kariya, Brad Boyes and Patrik Berglund. Defense and goaltending should also be decent, buoyed by the return of Erik Johnson. Chris Mason has to be as good as he was last year to keep the Blues in the race out west. Ultimately, I think they’ll just fall short of the playoffs, but it will be close.</p>
<p>10. Edmonton Oilers</p>
<p>Pat Quinn is back in the NHL, and he’s leading an Oilers team that hasn’t made the playoffs since their Finals appearance in 05/06. Fans are hungry in Edmonton, but I think the playoff drought will continue for another year. The offense is young and deep, but there’s a lack of first line talent. Defense is a bit of a weakness, though Khabibulin will be solid in net. Unfortunately for the Oilers, I just don’t see room for them in the playoffs.</p>
<p>11. Columbus Blue Jackets</p>
<p>Steve Mason’s amazing rookie season led the Blue Jackets to their first ever playoff berth last year, but I’m not sure that they’ll be in the playoff dance again this year. Rick Nash is in Columbus long term, and he’ll lead a capable offense again this year. The defense isn’t great, but as long as Mason is strong in net again, the Blue Jackets will be decent. Still, though, I don’t see the Blue Jackets growing playoff beards again this year.</p>
<p>12. Dallas Stars</p>
<p>The Stars have slowly slipped out of the West’s elite, and they missed the playoffs last year. I see that slide continuing this season, and I don’t think the Stars will be competing for a playoff spot. The team still has talent up front in Brendan Morrow, Brad Richards and Mike Ribeiro. The defense is unproven and looks weak, though, which means that Marty Turco will have to be at his best as a lot of rubber comes his way.</p>
<p>13. Nashville Predators</p>
<p>Nashville will boast an excellent defense this year, led by Shea Weber, but the rest of the team looks shaky. The offense will be relying on aging veterans such as Jason Arnott and Steve Sullivan, and scoring goals won’t be easy for this team. Pekka Rinne and Dan Ellis will be between the pipes for Nashville, and though Rinne wasn’t bad last year for the Preds, I’m not sure that he’ll be good enough to keep the team in contention for a playoff spot this year.</p>
<h2><strong>The Hopeless</strong></h2>
<p>14. Colorado Avalanche</p>
<p>After a long stretch of success under captain Joe Sakic, things finally gave last year, and the Avs are now rebuilding. They have some good young players that provide hope for the future, but this season will be a rough one in Denver. Throughout the lineup there’s a shortage of skill, and the Avs simply won’t be able to compete most nights. Goaltending is also a major issue – Peter Budaj has been able to get the job done the past few years, but he’s no Patrick Roy. It’ll be a long year for the Avalanche and their fans, and there’s little hope for the near future.</p>
<p>15. Phoenix Coyotes</p>
<p>The Coyotes are a mess, on and off the ice. They’re without a coach after Wayne Gretzky’s departure, fans in Phoenix don’t seem to care about the team, as they figure that it’s only a matter of time before the Coyotes end up in Hamilton. Of course, though, the only man who has expressed interest in buying the team, Jim Balsillie, is considered a villain among NHL owners and the NHL is hellbent on ensuring that he doesn’t end up owning the team. On the ice the situation isn’t much better. After captain Shane Doan, the Coyotes are extremely thin up front, and also weak on defense. Ilja Bryzgalov provides some stability in goal, and should still post good numbers this year, though he won’t be rewarded with many wins. This is going to be an ugly year for the Coyotes, though there may not be many people in the Jobing.com Arena to watch the Coyotes lose.</p>
<h2>Individual Awards</h2>
<p>Hart – Alex Ovechkin, Washington Capitals</p>
<p>This is Ovechkin’s trophy to lose. Though Malkin and Crosby are serious competition for the award, the fact that they both play for a loaded Penguins squad will always hurt their chances for the Hart. Though the Capitals are a deeper team than they’ve been in the past, there is still little doubt that they are Ovechkin’s team. I expect 60 goals and 60 assists from him this season, and that will be enough for Ovechkin to hold on to the Hart for another year.</p>
<p>Vezina – Martin Brodeur, New Jersey Devils</p>
<p>Though Brodeur is 37, I think he still has at least one more elite season left in him. Given that New Jersey lost several key players this offseason, Brodeur will be more important to the team than ever. Brodeur will keep the New Jersey Devils in the Eastern conference’s upper echelon, and he’ll take home a 5<sup>th</sup> Vezina for his efforts.</p>
<p>Norris – Nicklas Lidstrom, Detroit Red Wings</p>
<p>Though he’ll face stiff competition from Mike Green, Duncan Keith and Zdeno Chara, Lidstrom is still the most complete defenseman in the league. Green will be an offensive force with the Capitals, but isn’t solid enough in his own zone to win the Norris. Keith will continue to improve after a breakout season last year, but still isn’t quite as good as Lidstrom. Chara will continue to lead a very stingy Bruins team, but I don’t expect the Bruins to be as good as they were last year, and that will affect his standing with voters. Though Lidstrom, like Brodeur, is nearing the end of an illustrious career, he’s still the NHL’s best blueliner, and he’ll take home his 7<sup>th</sup> Norris trophy this year as a result.</p>
<p>Selke – Mike Richards, Philadelphia Flyers</p>
<p>Richards is an amazingly complete player. He plays hard at both ends of the ice and makes life difficult for opposing forwards. Though not as flashy as Pavel Datsyuk, Richards’ solid defensive play should go over well with Selke voters.</p>
<p>Calder – John Tavares, New York Islanders</p>
<p>Though Tavares won’t be an instant superstar in the mold of Alex Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby, I do expect a very solid rookie season from him. He’ll get lots of ice time on a bad Islanders team, and I’d expect him to pot 30 goals to go with 40 helpers, which should be more than enough to make him the NHL’s top rookie.</p>
<p>Jack Adams -  Pat Quinn, Edmonton Oilers</p>
<p>Though I don’t have the Oilers making the playoffs in a tough Western conference, I do think that Pat Quinn will improve this young team. Expect the Oilers to be a much better offensive team under Quinn. After finishing last season 18<sup>th</sup> in goals scored, the Oilers should be in the top third of the league this year, though defensive play will still be a weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-regular-season-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Playoff 2009 Round 2 Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-playoff-2009-round-2-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-playoff-2009-round-2-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tatum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Canucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ROUND 2 Predictions Boston(1) vs. Carolina(6) A maybe too well rested Boston squad faces off against Carolina, a team who should most probably be weary after knocking off the Devils in what I thought was a bit more than a slight upset. There are only two main hypotheses that come to mind in this case. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>ROUND 2 Predictions</em></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Boston</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(1) vs. Carolina(6)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A maybe too well rested Boston squad faces off against Carolina, a team who should most probably be weary after knocking off the Devils in what I thought was a bit more than a slight upset. There are only two main hypotheses that come to mind in this case. Boston will take some time to get back into the rhythm of things while Carolina will struggle to keep up the pace as the series lengthens. On that fact alone, I’d have to give the series to Boston, but seeing as how it’s the eastern conference leading Bruins up against the Canes, I can’t see this going any farther than 5 games.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Boston in 5</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A4ft20DYGx4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A4ft20DYGx4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Washington</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(2) vs. Pittsburgh(4)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As much as I enjoyed the Washington comeback in the previous round, I doubt that run will continue into the second round. Pittsburgh simply won’t provide the Capitals with the same comeback opportunities that a weak Rangers team did in round one. The only way I could see the Capitals making it to the next round is with outstanding backing by Varlamov to counter a strong Penguins offense, which seems unlikely as they go further into the playoffs considering his lack of experience.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Pittsburgh in 6</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Detroit</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(2) vs. Anaheim(8)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m not saying that Anaheim’s victory in the first round was anything less than what it was, but I’m sure San Jose would have found a way to lose against any team they played. This seemed like a fairly straight-forward prediction in Detroit. Between the play-off experience and steady goaltending Detroit should be able to pull through without too many problems. That being said, I do expect a Detroit hick-up sometime this series. It just seems to happen almost every year. So with that and Hiller possibly stealing a game or two, I expect this series to make it to 6 games.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Detroit in 6</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Vancouver</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(3) vs. Chicago(4)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hmmm…So here’s the tough decision. Do I go with a tough, emotional Canucks team who have a strong defensive presence centered around arguably, the best goaltender currently in the game, or do I go with a young, up and coming Hawks team with a lot of talent, who is quickly making a name for themselves this playoff season. For me this comes down directly between Chicago’s pipes. Will we see the “Bulin Wall”? I don’t think we will and that’s why I ultimately have to go with Vancouver. Either way, I think this is bound to be an exciting series which will most likely flip-flop in terms of wins.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Vancouver in 7</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o7WAY9n578U&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o7WAY9n578U&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-playoff-2009-round-2-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round One Recap</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-one-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-one-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Jose Vs. Anaheim The best player in this series was no doubt Hiller, followed closely by Getzlaf.  The sharks have been favored for years to advance far into the stanley cup playoffs, nothing change this year.  After being out scored, out hit, and out goaltendended again in the playoffs Thorton and Marleau&#8217;s leadership abilities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Jose Vs. Anaheim</p>
<p>The best player in this series was no doubt Hiller, followed closely by Getzlaf.  The sharks have been favored for years to advance far into the stanley cup playoffs, nothing change this year.  After being out scored, out hit, and out goaltendended again in the playoffs Thorton and Marleau&#8217;s leadership abilities have come into question.  Their are even rumours swirling that Marleau and\or Thorton are on the out&#8217;s from San Jose.  Enough about San Jose, lets talk bout the winners.  The top line from the Ducks featuring Ryan, Getzlaf, and Perry played amazing, arguably one of the best in the first series.  Niedermayer led the way on defence, and Pronger had a great series.  We must not forget about hte efforts of Beauchemain, and Wisneski.  I Called San Jose in this series, but this is the last time I bank on San Jose</p>
<p>Detroit Vs. Columbus</p>
<p>Best player in the series was Osgood, showing why hes one of the best playoff goalies of our generation.  There isnt much to write about this series.  No one took Columbus as a threat and the Wings just mowed over the Blue Jackets.  I called this series correctly, but then again who didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Vancover Vs. St-Louis</p>
<p>Best player in this series was Luongo.  Once again no surprises here, even though the Blues were the hottest team going into the playoffs, Vancover was superior on paper, and that translated nicely onto the ice.  A physical series that didn&#8217;t last very long.  I called this series correctly.</p>
<p>Chicago Vs. Calgary</p>
<p>By far the best series in the west, with the best player being Seabrook.  Seabrook is now the highest scoring defensemen in the playoffs played a good shut-down role alongside Keith and really gave it to Igilna, who was mediocore, at best in this series.  This series has intense physical battles, Byfuglien, Burrish played their roles perfectly.  Byfuglien was a force all series even scoring goals, and being a good finess player (See his play in the last game where he circled Leopold).  Toews played great in his frist series, but Kane, Jokinen, and Cammaleri weren&#8217;t anything amazing but nevertheless fun to watch.  I took Chicago in this series.</p>
<p>Boston Vs. Montreal</p>
<p>Its hard to pick a best player in this Series I will give the award to Kessel, Savard, Chara, and Ryder.  It&#8217;s hard to say anything positive about this series Montreal centenial season was plagued with downs, and this series was another one of those downs.  Boston played a physical game and this took its toll on the Habs and threw them off their game. Like everyone else I took Boston in this series</p>
<p>Washington Vs. Rangers</p>
<p>Varlemov was probably the best player in this series, but facing a low scoring Rangers offence can make any goalie look good.  The star players from the Capitals didnt play particularily good, but luckily neither did the Ranger&#8217;s.  I tookl the Rangers to win this series for one reason.  I didnt think a team backstopped by Theodore could win a series, and I was technically right, but I know now to not overestimate the ranger.  Lundquist could steal a game or two b ut not 4.</p>
<p>New Jersey Vs. Carolina</p>
<p>You have to say Stall was the best player in this series.  What an end to game 7, kudos to the Canes for not quitting.  I expected alot more from the Devils after a terrific season without Brodeur, but I guess even Brodeur couldnt prevent Gleason from making that amazing play to keep the puck alive in the final minutes of game 7.  I took New Jersey in this series, but I would still do the same pick, and don&#8217;t regret it.</p>
<p>Pittsburg Vs. Philidelpia</p>
<p>The best players in this series was Crosby and Malkin.  Another tough chapter in the battle of Pensylvania once again the Pens come out as victors.  I would have liked to see more of Gonchar in this series, not just Gonchar, but also all of the Pittsburg defense squad wasent too engaged in the series.  The Flyers put up a good fight but their highest paid player in Briere wasn&#8217;t anywhere to be found.  Also, nice to see Giroux stand up and show how good of a player he actually is. I called Pittsburg to win this series.</p>
<p>Round Two Predictions to come</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-one-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

