NHL 11-12 Standings Using a 3-Point System

For the past few of years I have made a post showing what the NHL standings for that season would have looked like using a true 3-point system.  For those of you who don’t know this system involves every game awarding 3 points, rather than just games that go to overtime.  This means that wins are worth 3 points, overtime/shootout wins are worth 2 and overtime/shootout losses are worth 1.  I personally think that awarding 3 games in some games rather than others is completely ridiculous and goes against the integrity and fairness of the sport.  The 3-point system is an easy and obvious alternative.

I’ve gone into more detail about why the 3-point system is an obvious choice for the NHL so I won’t get into all of the reasons again.  Instead you can click here to read that post.

Basically the just of it is that the NHL is rewarding teams for going to overtime.  This creates teams playing for a tie in regulation and sitting back with 5 minutes left to go in order to guarantee a point, especially against out of Conference teams.  This ends up resulting in lower scoring games because just looking at simple math a team that plays in lower scoring games will end up with more regulation ties than a team who plays a higher scoring style (if a team averages 2 goals for and 2 against a game they will be in more ties than a team that averages 3 goals for and against).  Basically the current system goes against everything that the GM’s say they want in the game (more scoring and competitiveness) just because they want the standings to “appear” to be tighter so that fans get the impression their team is better than they are.  A GM or coach can say their team is a .500 club when they are 20-20-15, when in reality they are a horrible team at that record.  The NHL seriously needs to look at this and keep the competitiveness and fairness in the game so that the best teams make the playoffs.

Luckily this year the 3-point system wouldn’t have had too much of an affect on which teams made the playoffs, but the seedings would have been slightly different and a different team would have won the president’s trophy.  Let’s take a look.

Eastern Conference

Regular Standings vs 3-point System Standings

		Regulation Wins	OT/SO Wins	OT/SO Losses	Losses	Total Points
1	NY Rangers	39	12	7	24	148
2	Boston	38	11	4	29	140
3	Florida	31	7	18	26	125
4	Pittsburgh	40	11	6	25	148
5	Philadelphia	37	10	9	26	140
6	New Jersey	32	16	6	28	134
7	Washington	31	11	8	32	123
8	Ottawa	30	11	10	31	122
9	Buffalo	27	12	11	32	116
10	Winnipeg	27	10	10	35	111
11	Carolina	29	4	16	33	111
12	Tampa Bay	25	13	8	36	109
13	Toronto	26	9	10	37	106
14	NY Islanders	24	10	11	37	103
15	Montreal	24	7	16	35	102

As you can see the only change in the Eastern Conference would have been the Tamp Bay Lightning dropping 2 places to 12th in the East, which would have bumped the Jets and Hurricanes each up one spot.  This is primarily because of the number of Lightning overtime/shootout wins in the regular season.  The Playoff match-ups would have remained the same in the East which is quite rare.

Western Conference

Regular Standings vs 3-point System Standings

		Regulation Wins	OT/SO Wins	OT/SO Losses	Losses	Total Points
1	St Louis	42	7	11	22	151
2	Vancouver	36	15	9	22	147
3	Phoenix	35	9	13	27	136
4	Nashville	40	8	8	26	144
5	Detroit	36	12	6	28	138
6	Chicago	34	11	11	26	135
7	San Jose	31	12	10	29	127
8	Los Angeles	31	9	15	27	126
9	Calgary	32	5	16	29	122
10	Dallas	31	11	5	35	120
11	Colorado	25	16	6	35	113
12	Anaheim	29	5	12	36	109
13	Minnesota	22	13	11	36	103
14	Edmonton	25	7	10	40	99
15	Columbus	23	6	7	46	88

In the Western Conference there was one change in the playoff positionings and it would have turned out to be quite a significant change because the St Louis Blues would have moved to first place in the Western Conference and in the league, which would have won the Blues the President’s Trophy and a different first round matchup. Who knows if the Blues would have been able to handle the Kings or if the Canucks would have had an easier time with the Sharks.

The only other change was Anaheim moving ahead of Minnesota by a significant margin due to the vast number of overtime/shootout wins by the Wild.

This year the changes in the standings weren’t drastic, but other years they have determined whether a team makes or misses the playoffs.  The NHL really needs to take a look at this 3-point system and give it serious consideration.

Written by: Niko de Jonge

NHL 2008-2009 Standings Using 3-Point System

I’m a big believer in the NHL switching over to a 3-point system that awards 3 points for regulation wins, 2 points for overtime/shootout wins, 1 point for overtime/shootout losses and nothing for regulation losses.

I feel that the current system of awarding 2 points some games and 3 points others is completely ridiculous because it encourages regulation ties and makes it difficult for teams to gain any ground in the standings during the playoff races.

I’m going to be adding a detailed article outline why I think the NHL should make the switch to the 3-point system in the near future.  In the mean time I have done some research and analyzed how the standings would have looked last year had the 3-point system been used:

Eastern Conference

Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System

	Team	GP	Wins	OT Wins	OT Losses	Losses	Points
1	Boston	82	46	7	10	19	162
2	Washington	82	40	10	8	24	148
3	New Jersey	82	37	14	4	27	143
4	Philadelphia	82	34	10	11	27	133
5	Carolina	82	35	10	7	30	132
6	Pittsburgh	82	33	12	9	28	132
7	Florida	82	34	7	11	30	127
8	New York Rangers	82	30	13	9	30	125
9	Montreal	82	30	11	11	30	123
10	Buffalo	82	31	10	9	32	122
11	Ottawa	82	29	7	11	35	112
12	Toronto	82	24	10	13	35	105
13	Atlanta	82	24	11	6	41	100
14	Tampa Bay	82	19	5	18	40	85
15	New York Islanders	82	20	6	9	47	81

As you can see using the 3-point system would have made some significant changes in the Eastern Conference.  Most notably, the Florida Panthers would have finished seventh with 127 points, passing the New York Rangers and pushing the Montreal Canadiens out of the playoffs.  The Habs played 22 overtime/shootout games in 08-09 and this played a major role in allowing them to sneak into the 8th playoff spot in the East.  Another change would be the Penguins falling from 4th to 6th position.  This would have meant that the Penguins play the New Jersey Devils in the first round of the playoffs, which could have caused the entire Stanley Cup run to play out differently.  Most people would agree at the Panthers deserved to be in the playoffs and likely would have put up more of a fight than the Canadiens.

Western Conference

Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System

		GP	Wins	OT Wins	OT Losses	Losses	Points
1	San Jose	82	44	9	11	18	161
2	Detroit	82	42	9	10	21	154
3	Calgary	82	40	6	6	30	138
4	Chicago	82	36	10	12	24	140
5	Vancouver	82	37	8	10	27	137
6	St. Louis	82	31	10	10	31	123
7	Columbus	82	31	10	10	31	123
8	Minnesota	82	33	7	9	33	122
9	Anaheim	82	30	12	7	33	121
10	Nashville	82	28	12	8	34	116
11	Edmonton	82	31	7	9	35	116
12	Phoenix	82	32	4	7	39	111
13	Dallas	82	25	11	11	35	108
14	Los Angeles	82	26	8	11	37	105
15	Colorado	82	20	12	5	45	89

Using the 3-point system, the Minnesota Wild would have squeaked into the 8th place spot and the Anaheim Mighty Ducks would have missed the playoffs but 1 point.  If that’s not a good race then I don’t know what is.  Sixth through ninth in the West has only a 2 point difference in the West.  This was a 4 point difference using the current system and it’s much more difficult to make up points the way points are currently allotted.  So there goes the argument that the playoff races would be less exciting with the 3-point system.  Both Nashville and Edmonton would have been in it right to the end as well with 116 points a piece.  The only other change the 3-point system would have made is Calgary and Vancouver switching places (but they would both have likely still lost to Havlat and the ‘Hawks anyways ).

As you can see the 3-point system isn’t going to drastically change the standings.  However, it is the fairer way to award points and the slight differences would have been huge for both Florida and Minnesota who really each deserved to be in the playoffs based on their records.  Minnesota played in 3 less overtime games than the Ducks and Florida played in 4 fewer OT games than the Habs.  The current NHL point system is supposedly rewarding competition, but in reality it is rewarding mediocrity.  The teams that play for a tie are rewarded, while the teams that play for the win are penalized.

That’s it for now.  I’ll have another post on this topic within the few days outlining why the NHL should switch to the 3-point system.