NHL 2008-2009 Standings Using 3-Point System
October 8, 2009 by Niko
Filed under Hockey Opinions
I’m a big believer in the NHL switching over to a 3-point system that awards 3 points for regulation wins, 2 points for overtime/shootout wins, 1 point for overtime/shootout losses and nothing for regulation losses.
I feel that the current system of awarding 2 points some games and 3 points others is completely ridiculous because it encourages regulation ties and makes it difficult for teams to gain any ground in the standings during the playoff races.
I’m going to be adding a detailed article outline why I think the NHL should make the switch to the 3-point system in the near future. In the mean time I have done some research and analyzed how the standings would have looked last year had the 3-point system been used:
Eastern Conference
Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System

| Team | GP | Wins | OT Wins | OT Losses | Losses | Points | |
| 1 | Boston | 82 | 46 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 162 |
| 2 | Washington | 82 | 40 | 10 | 8 | 24 | 148 |
| 3 | New Jersey | 82 | 37 | 14 | 4 | 27 | 143 |
| 4 | Philadelphia | 82 | 34 | 10 | 11 | 27 | 133 |
| 5 | Carolina | 82 | 35 | 10 | 7 | 30 | 132 |
| 6 | Pittsburgh | 82 | 33 | 12 | 9 | 28 | 132 |
| 7 | Florida | 82 | 34 | 7 | 11 | 30 | 127 |
| 8 | New York Rangers | 82 | 30 | 13 | 9 | 30 | 125 |
| 9 | Montreal | 82 | 30 | 11 | 11 | 30 | 123 |
| 10 | Buffalo | 82 | 31 | 10 | 9 | 32 | 122 |
| 11 | Ottawa | 82 | 29 | 7 | 11 | 35 | 112 |
| 12 | Toronto | 82 | 24 | 10 | 13 | 35 | 105 |
| 13 | Atlanta | 82 | 24 | 11 | 6 | 41 | 100 |
| 14 | Tampa Bay | 82 | 19 | 5 | 18 | 40 | 85 |
| 15 | New York Islanders | 82 | 20 | 6 | 9 | 47 | 81 |
As you can see using the 3-point system would have made some significant changes in the Eastern Conference. Most notably, the Florida Panthers would have finished seventh with 127 points, passing the New York Rangers and pushing the Montreal Canadiens out of the playoffs. The Habs played 22 overtime/shootout games in 08-09 and this played a major role in allowing them to sneak into the 8th playoff spot in the East. Another change would be the Penguins falling from 4th to 6th position. This would have meant that the Penguins play the New Jersey Devils in the first round of the playoffs, which could have caused the entire Stanley Cup run to play out differently. Most people would agree at the Panthers deserved to be in the playoffs and likely would have put up more of a fight than the Canadiens.
Western Conference
Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System

| GP | Wins | OT Wins | OT Losses | Losses | Points | ||
| 1 | San Jose | 82 | 44 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 161 |
| 2 | Detroit | 82 | 42 | 9 | 10 | 21 | 154 |
| 3 | Calgary | 82 | 40 | 6 | 6 | 30 | 138 |
| 4 | Chicago | 82 | 36 | 10 | 12 | 24 | 140 |
| 5 | Vancouver | 82 | 37 | 8 | 10 | 27 | 137 |
| 6 | St. Louis | 82 | 31 | 10 | 10 | 31 | 123 |
| 7 | Columbus | 82 | 31 | 10 | 10 | 31 | 123 |
| 8 | Minnesota | 82 | 33 | 7 | 9 | 33 | 122 |
| 9 | Anaheim | 82 | 30 | 12 | 7 | 33 | 121 |
| 10 | Nashville | 82 | 28 | 12 | 8 | 34 | 116 |
| 11 | Edmonton | 82 | 31 | 7 | 9 | 35 | 116 |
| 12 | Phoenix | 82 | 32 | 4 | 7 | 39 | 111 |
| 13 | Dallas | 82 | 25 | 11 | 11 | 35 | 108 |
| 14 | Los Angeles | 82 | 26 | 8 | 11 | 37 | 105 |
| 15 | Colorado | 82 | 20 | 12 | 5 | 45 | 89 |
Using the 3-point system, the Minnesota Wild would have squeaked into the 8th place spot and the Anaheim Mighty Ducks would have missed the playoffs but 1 point. If that’s not a good race then I don’t know what is. Sixth through ninth in the West has only a 2 point difference in the West. This was a 4 point difference using the current system and it’s much more difficult to make up points the way points are currently allotted. So there goes the argument that the playoff races would be less exciting with the 3-point system. Both Nashville and Edmonton would have been in it right to the end as well with 116 points a piece. The only other change the 3-point system would have made is Calgary and Vancouver switching places (but they would both have likely still lost to Havlat and the ‘Hawks anyways
).
As you can see the 3-point system isn’t going to drastically change the standings. However, it is the fairer way to award points and the slight differences would have been huge for both Florida and Minnesota who really each deserved to be in the playoffs based on their records. Minnesota played in 3 less overtime games than the Ducks and Florida played in 4 fewer OT games than the Habs. The current NHL point system is supposedly rewarding competition, but in reality it is rewarding mediocrity. The teams that play for a tie are rewarded, while the teams that play for the win are penalized.
That’s it for now. I’ll have another post on this topic within the few days outlining why the NHL should switch to the 3-point system.



I have to Agree with you. A team could lose every game they play in a shoot-out and still be a 500 hockey club. Just ridiculous