<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Hockey Opinions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hockeyopinions.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hockeyopinions.com</link>
	<description>Hockey Opinions and Debates from NHL Fans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ways To Bet On Hockey</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/ways-to-bet-on-hockey/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/ways-to-bet-on-hockey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 19:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hockey stands apart somewhat from games like basketball and football in that there is low scoring and a low scoring differential between teams. This makes betting on hockey slightly different from betting on these other sports, but it’s still pretty simple  like playing video poker if you know what you’re doing.
Hockey Betting Option 1: Money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hockey stands apart somewhat from games like basketball and football in that there is low scoring and a low scoring differential between teams. This makes betting on hockey slightly different from betting on these other sports, but it’s still pretty simple  like playing <a href="http://www.casinotoplists.com/online-video-poker">video poker</a> if you know what you’re doing.</p>
<h3>Hockey Betting Option 1: Money Line</h3>
<p>One of the best ways to bet on the outcome of any sporting contest is by playing the money line, which is really just like a standards odds bet. Instead of comparing the payout odds to 1, however (ex. 3-to-1, 8-to-1) they are compared to $100.</p>
<p>Money line example: New Jersey -140/+120 Phoenix. This money line means that a bet on New Jersey to win the game will cost $140 to win $100. A bet on Phoenix, on the other hand, requires only a $100 wager to win $120. Expressed in terms of odds, someone betting on New Jersey is laying (giving up) 1.4-to-1, while someone betting on Phoenix is getting 1.2-to-1.</p>
<h3>Hockey Betting Option 2: Puck Line</h3>
<p>The puck line is a variation on the money line that better takes into account the relative strength of the two teams. A puck line may look like this: New Jersey -1.5 -110/-110 +1.5 Phoenix. This means that whether you bet on New Jersey or Phoenix, you will have to wager $110 to win $100. However, if you take Phoenix, you get one and a half goals, meaning that even if Phoenix loses, you win, as long as they lose by only one goal. In contrast, you get better odds than before for taking New Jersey, but if the Devils win by only one goal, it still counts as a loss.</p>
<h3>Deciding Which Hockey Betting Option to Take</h3>
<p>If you’re confident in your team’s ability to win and feel like you can win playing <a href="http://www.casinotoplists.com/online-slots">slot machines</a> but your team is the underdog, you are probably better off taking the better odds offered by the money line. If you think your team needs a little help, the puck line may be better for you. If you’re going with the favorite, you should take the money line unless you are confident that your team will blow out the opponent, in which case you might take the puck line with the preferred odds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/ways-to-bet-on-hockey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kovalchuk Resigning with New Jersey is Bad for Player and Team</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/kovalchuk-resigning-with-new-jersey-is-bad-for-player-and-team/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/kovalchuk-resigning-with-new-jersey-is-bad-for-player-and-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free agent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ilya Kovalchuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ilya Kovalchuk has just signed a new seventeen year deal to stay a New Jersey Devil for his foreseeable future.  The cap hit will be only $6 Million a season, but Kovalchuk and the Devils played the system by only really paying Kovalchuk what he wanted and deserves for the first ten years of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ilya Kovalchuk has just signed a new seventeen year deal to stay a New Jersey Devil for his foreseeable future.  The cap hit will be only $6 Million a season, but Kovalchuk and the Devils played the system by only really paying Kovalchuk what he wanted and deserves for the first ten years of the deal.  The final seven years were just meant to bring the cap hit down, by paying only $750,000.  I think the NHL needs to look at this problem with the cap because teams are exploiting this and nobody can blame them for it because if there is a loophole it is the general managers right and obligation to use it to the best advantage of the team.  Kovalchuk will now retire after 10 years when the money he receives starts to decrease and he will in effect have been paid by the team ~$10,000,000 a season.</p>
<p>Now, onto why Kovalchuk signing in New Jersey is not good for the team or for him individually.  If you look at his numbers last season in Atlanta compared to in New Jersey, Kovalchuk&#8217;s production dropped significantly in New Jersey.  He only managed a point a game in New Jersey, while in Atlanta he was ripping it up at a much higher output.  The Devils are known as a defensive team who don&#8217;t score a tremendous amount of goals and this just isn&#8217;t what Kovalchuk was made for.</p>
<p>The team also sputtered after adding Kovalchuk to the lineup and went out quickly in the first round of the playoffs, only managing one win.  Kovalchuk did lead the team in scoring in the playoffs so you can&#8217;t put the blame directly on him, but I think the Devils should be Parise&#8217;s team and I&#8217;m just not convinced that Kovalchuk will ever find chemistry or find his place on a team such as the Devils.</p>
<p>In Los Angeles, Kovalchuk would have been on a younger, up and coming team who play much more his style of game.  He would have blossomed even further offensively in LA playing with the likes of Drew Doughty, Anze Kopitar and the other young stars on the team.  In New Jersey Kovalchuk will not be challenging for any individual awards anymore, whereas in Los Angeles he could have been a threat for the Art Ross or Maurice Richard trophies for years to come.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the deal for either side and I don&#8217;t like how the NHL is allowing teams to blatantly take advantage of the salary cap loop holes by allowing ridiculously front loaded deals for ridiculous amounts of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/kovalchuk-resigning-with-new-jersey-is-bad-for-player-and-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congrats To The Chicago Blackhawks</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/congrats-to-the-chicago-blackhawks/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/congrats-to-the-chicago-blackhawks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 22:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[champions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hossa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanley cup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tallon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just wanted to write a quick post to say congratulations to the Chicago Blackhawks.  They had a terrific year and deserved to win the Stanley Cup.  I couldn&#8217;t have said the same about the Flyers so I&#8217;m happy the Blackhawks won.  I like underdog stories, but I prefer for the best team to win [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to write a quick post to say congratulations to the Chicago Blackhawks.  They had a terrific year and deserved to win the Stanley Cup.  I couldn&#8217;t have said the same about the Flyers so I&#8217;m happy the Blackhawks won.  I like underdog stories, but I prefer for the best team to win when possible to maintain the integrity of the league.  Sure it&#8217;s great if anyone can win, but it&#8217;s also nice if there are better teams than others in order to show that the game involves skill and not luck.</p>
<p>Hossa deserved the cup as well.  I give him mad respect for only wanting to play for teams who had a legitimate chance at the Stanley Cup.  He&#8217;s played a tremendous amount of games over the past three years making the finals each of the last three years with different teams and also representing his country at the Olympics.  Good for you Hossa.</p>
<p>Kane proved me wrong this year.  He has definitely matured into a much more well rounded player.  One that I would love to have on my team.  I&#8217;m glad he scored the overtime goal because it&#8217;s nice when a star player can score that goal to win the Stanley Cup for his team.</p>
<p>This Stanley Cup also proves that paying the depth players what they have and handcuffing themselves for next season paid off.  If a team could win the cup one year only to miss the playoffs the next 4 years in a row they should take that deal any day.  And the great thing about the &#8216;Hawks is even if the lose some players they still have the cornerstones in place for them to be a great team for a long time, so they don&#8217;t even have to worry about becoming a losing team.  Dale Tallon deserves a lot of credit for building this team.  Maybe he actually did know what he was doing when he paid those players what he did!</p>
<p>Anyways, I&#8217;m going to wrap this up.  Congrats to the Blackhawks.  Next year it&#8217;s going to be a Sens vs Wild finals <img src='http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/congrats-to-the-chicago-blackhawks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Western Conference Round 2</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/western-conference-round-2/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/western-conference-round-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/western-conference-round-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My predictions went 5 for 8, I lost out on Washington, La, and Buffalo.  This round I’m saying Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburg, and Philly.
Detroit Vs. San Jose
Detroit owned the season series 3-1 this year, and has really picked it up at the end of the Phoenix series.  With Datsyuk and Lidstrom each getting two [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My predictions went 5 for 8, I lost out on Washington, La, and Buffalo.  This round I’m saying Chicago, Detroit, Pittsburg, and Philly.</p>
<p>Detroit Vs. San Jose<br />
Detroit owned the season series 3-1 this year, and has really picked it up at the end of the Phoenix series.  With Datsyuk and Lidstrom each getting two goals in the deciding game 7, combine that with Zetterberg leading the series in goals with 6, which is second overall in the playoffs to former teammate Mikeal Samuelsson.  This is problematic for the Sharks as their top line of Heatley, Marleau, and Thorton have no goals in the Colorado series.  The Sharks best players need to be their best players if they want any chance against Detroit.  In the end I think Detroit takes this, all their best players are clicking right now, and Howard is beginning to look more and more like a legitimate number one goalie.</p>
<p>Chicago Vs. Vancouver<br />
This series was a great series last year, with Chicago coming out on top you know the Canucks wanted a chance at revenge.  In anticipation for this series Joel Quenville moved Byfuglien from defense back onto forward to cause more havoc in front of Luongo just like last year.  Both teams have improved this year, notably Vancouver with the year the Sedins had, and the emergence of Burrows.  Overall I think Chicago takes this one, they have the advantage in physical play, and Luongo hasn’t been the best of recently while Niemi posted two shutouts last round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/western-conference-round-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Predictions, and Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/predictions-and-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/predictions-and-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 21:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These have been one of the most exciting playoff years up to date, with every series being tied 1-1, and some physical and high scoring series what more do hockey fans want.
Before I discuss the playoffs I will share what my predictions were
I had Detroit, Los Angeles, San Jose, and Chicago coming out of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These have been one of the most exciting playoff years up to date, with every series being tied 1-1, and some physical and high scoring series what more do hockey fans want.</p>
<p>Before I discuss the playoffs I will share what my predictions were</p>
<p>I had Detroit, Los Angeles, San Jose, and Chicago coming out of the West.</p>
<p>I had Philadelphia, Pittsburg, Washington, and Buffalo coming out of the East.</p>
<p>Things aren’t that far off so I’m content.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Detroit</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> Phoenix Series</span></p>
<p>This series has been the best by far.  The Yotes are definitely out hitting the Wings, but the Wings are coming alive in the physical department with the addition of Justin Abdelkater.  Him and Darren Helm are hitting anything that moves, but they are both overshadowed by the play of Coyotes captain Shane Doan.  Doan has been a machine for the Coyotes, this is costing the team as Doan has taking two minor penalties (Charging on Kronwall, and interference on Lidstrom), both of which resulted in a Detroit goal.</p>
<p>Now this is all lost as Doan left game 3 with an unknown upper body injury when he slammed into the boards after tripping over Red Wings goaltender Jimmy Howard.  This might be the end of the series for Phoenix.  Without Doan they lose one of their best players, and their captain.  I can’t see Detroit losing two in a row at home, and specially if Doan is out for game 4.  Expect a win tomorrow at the Joe Louis Arena, and then a exciting finish for the last three games of the series.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">San Jose</span></p>
<p>I know every spring the Sharks always lose out in the playoffs with an amazing team, so far this year it isn’t looking any different.  We have to give the Sharks credit though, they brutally outshot the Avs and lost in overtime to a fluke goal.  They need a big bounce back game in game 4, but I don’t know if I see this happening.  Dany Heatley didn’t play in game three because of an undisclosed upper body injury, if he isn’t back for game 4 it’ll be a tough game for the Sharks.  With Thorton and Marleau goaless, and with the overtime goal shadowing Boyle the Sharks need to dig deep for the win.  The Avs are a young, hungry, and confident team now except them to come out of the gate early in game four.</p>
<p>If the Sharks lose this series, and get eliminated from the playoffs early again the team needs to do some serious roster moves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/predictions-and-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 1 NHL Playoff Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1-nhl-playoff-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1-nhl-playoff-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round 1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[round one]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is going to be a quick post stating my first round NHL playoff predictions.  The run to the Stanley Cup begins tomorrow so it&#8217;s an exciting time of year for hockey fans everywhere.  I&#8217;m not sure if you remember, but last year I went 8 for 8 in the first round of the playoffs, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a quick post stating my first round NHL playoff predictions.  The run to the Stanley Cup begins tomorrow so it&#8217;s an exciting time of year for hockey fans everywhere.  I&#8217;m not sure if you remember, but last year I went 8 for 8 in the first round of the playoffs, which included upsets such as Anaheim over the Sharks and the Hurricanes over the Devils.  This year I hope to do the same, but my first round predictions don&#8217;t include as many big upsets.  Check them out below:</p>
<h3>Eastern Conference Predictions</h3>
<p>(1) Washington Capitals -650<br />
(8) Montreal Canadiens +425</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Washington Capitals in 5.</strong></p>
<p>(2) New Jersey Devils -235<br />
(7) Philadelphia Flyers +195</p>
<p><strong>Winner: New Jersey Devils in 6.</strong></p>
<p>(3) Buffalo Sabres -170<br />
(6) Boston Bruins +150</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Boston Bruins in 6.</strong></p>
<p>(4) Pittsburgh Penguins -280<br />
(5) Ottawa Senators +240</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Pittsburgh Penguins in 6.</strong></p>
<h3>Western Conference Predictions</h3>
<p>(1) San Jose Sharks -450<br />
(8) Colorado Avalanche +325</p>
<p><strong>Winner: San Jose Sharks in 4.</strong></p>
<p>(2) Chicago Blackhawks -450<br />
(7) Nashville Predators +325</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Chicago Blackhawks in 6.</strong></p>
<p>(3) Vancouver Canucks -245<br />
(6) Los Angeles Kings +205</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Vancouver Canucks in 5.</strong></p>
<p>(4) Phoenix Coyotes +165<br />
(5) Detroit Red Wings -190</p>
<p><strong>Winner: Detroit Red Wings in 7.</strong></p>
<p>If you like <a href="http://www.icehockeybetting.org" target="_blank">hockey betting</a> then I would suggest signing up at <a href="http://www.bookmaker.com/?cmpid=9808_746" target="_blank">Bookmaker.com</a>.  They will have <a href="http://www.nhlodds.org/nhl-playoffs-first-round-betting-odds/">NHL playoff first round odds</a> for every series so you can place as many bets as you&#8217;d like!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1-nhl-playoff-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>End of Season NHL Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/end-of-season-nhl-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/end-of-season-nhl-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art ross trophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maurice richard trophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents trophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stanley cup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maurice Richard Trophy Winner
Who will finish the season with the most goals?  Right now it&#8217;s between Crosby (45), Ovechkin (44) &#38; Stamkos (42).
If Ovechkin didn&#8217;t keep getting suspended this year he&#8217;d probably already have close to 50 goals, but his hard hitting, (some may say reckless) style has kept him out of a few games [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Maurice Richard Trophy Winner</h3>
<p>Who will finish the season with the most goals?  Right now it&#8217;s between Crosby (45), Ovechkin (44) &amp; Stamkos (42).</p>
<p>If Ovechkin didn&#8217;t keep getting suspended this year he&#8217;d probably already have close to 50 goals, but his hard hitting, (some may say reckless) style has kept him out of a few games this year.  Ovechkin has missed 10 games this year, but he is still only one goal behind Crosby.  If Ovy can play the final 11 games for the Capitals then I&#8217;m going to give the benefit of the doubt to Ovechkin and say he is most likely to win the Maurice.</p>
<p>I think it would be hilarious if Crosby scored more goals than Ovechkin this year and won the Maurice, while Ovechkin got way more assists than Crosby and won the Art Ross.  That kind of roll reversal would be funny to me, but I don&#8217;t anticipate it happening.</p>
<h3>Art Ross Trophy Winner</h3>
<p>This is basically a two horse race at the moment: Ovechkin (96), H. Sedin (94).  Those two games missed by Ovechkin recently allowed Sedin to gain 3 points to be within 2 with each player having 11 games remaining.  As much as I would like to see Henrik take this trophy and put a dent in the &#8220;big 3&#8243; of Ovechkin, Crosby and Malkin, I can&#8217;t see it happening.  The Capitals are just too explosive.  They will score and Ovy will get points.  I&#8217;m not saying they will score because of Ovy, but they will score a lot and he will inevitably get points.  I don&#8217;t think Ovechkin is as good as most people think though and I believe the Capitals would actually be better off in the playoffs without him.  That being said Backstrom to me is one of the best in the game today and Ovechkin will benefit from playing with him.</p>
<h3>Presidents Trophy Winner</h3>
<p>This trophy is pretty much already awarded.  Just give it to the Washington Capitals and Alex Ovechkin right now.  If he sweeps all of these awards it would be pretty remarkable.  Good thing he didn&#8217;t win the gold medal at the Olympics!</p>
<h3>Stanley Cup Winner</h3>
<p>I might as well make a Stanley Cup prediction in this post as well.  Right now I&#8217;m going to say the Chicago Blackhawks, but this could quickly change by the end of the year.  Some of you might be saying, &#8220;why not Washington?&#8221;.  Well to be honest I don&#8217;t think Ovechkin is a good playoff ingredient for that team.  Last year he would try to do everything himself and that&#8217;s just not the way to win playoff games.  If Ovechkin and the Capitals continue to play a team based offensive game like they have been all season and it doesn&#8217;t turn into the Ovechkin show then I think the Capitals have a legit chance of doing something great this season.</p>
<p>You can check out the odds for all of these predictions at many <a href="http://www.thesportsgeek.com/" target="_blank">sports betting sites</a> online.  If you do wager, be sure to go with my picks if you want to win money <img src='http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/end-of-season-nhl-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Midseason Playoff Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-midseason-playoff-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-midseason-playoff-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The playoff races are starting to heat up and I am beginning to lean certain ways as to which teams will end up playing for the Stanley Cup in May and June.  You may be surprised by some of my picks, but you may agree.  Anyways here we go:
Eastern Conference
The Shoe-ins
Washington Capitals, New Jersey Devils, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The playoff races are starting to heat up and I am beginning to lean certain ways as to which teams will end up playing for the Stanley Cup in May and June.  You may be surprised by some of my picks, but you may agree.  Anyways here we go:</p>
<h2>Eastern Conference</h2>
<h3>The Shoe-ins</h3>
<p>Washington Capitals, New Jersey Devils, Pittsburgh Penguins, Buffalo Sabres.<br />
These teams would have to blow up and really drop to not end up in the post season.</p>
<h3>The Last Four</h3>
<p>Ottawa Senators, Philadelphia Flyers, Boston Bruins, Florida Panthers.</p>
<p>Ottawa has come on strong in the last few games and really seperated themselves from the pack in terms of qualifying for the playoffs.  Similarly the Flyers have remembered how to win and I would be very surprised if this preseason &#8220;cup contender&#8221; fails to make the playoffs in such a weak conference.  This same mentality is used for the Bruins who have been dropping of late, but I expect them to find their game and get some W&#8217;s in the win column soon.  My surprise pick here may be the Florida Panthers.  I basically used process of elimination to come to this pick and the play of Tomas Vokoun definitely helped.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t feel the Canadiens are a good enough team to make the playoffs this year.  The return of Markov definitely helped them, but their lack of offense and lack of solid star power should keep them out of the playoffs.  Camalleri, Plekanec and Markov have to really step up and lead this team if they have any chance in my eyes.  The Rangers are similar in that they have no scoring.  It seems like Gaborik is in on 75% of the teams goals and they need some secondary scoring to start winning games again.  The Islanders have a chance, but for a team that was predicted to come last in the league I am really surprised they are in the hunt and will be extremely surprised if they make it.</p>
<h2>Western Conference</h2>
<h3>Shoe-Ins</h3>
<p>Chicago Blackhawks, San Jose Sharks</p>
<p>There are only two shoe-ins in the West and these teams are dominant.  We&#8217;ll have to see how they fare in the playoffs.</p>
<h3>Remaining Six</h3>
<p>Vancouver Canucks, Colorado Avalanche, Phoenix Coyotes, Detroit Red Wings, LA Kings, Minnesota Wild.</p>
<p>The Canucks are a great team, it just took them a while to get going this year.  They will be a Stanley Cup contender.  The Avs and Coyotes have taken the league by surprise this year and I am hopeful that both teams can keep it together and put up enough wins to make the playoffs.  Anderson and Bryzgalov have been great and if they can each keep up their stellar play the playoffs should be in the picture.  The Wings are starting to turn their year around as they continue to get healthier.  If you told me at the beginning of the year the Red Wings wouldn&#8217;t make the playoffs I would have laughed at you, and I still think I would laugh.  They are just too good to not even make the postseason.  Finally, my last two slots go to the Kings and the Wild.  The Kings are a great young team and I believe that they can hold on to one of those playoff teams with a big W streak at some point before the 82 game mark.  The Wild are my favourite Western team so there may be some bias in this prediction, but I really like their team and I think they have the character to put up a strong end to the season and slip in.</p>
<p>You can check out the <a href="http://nhlbettingtips.com/nhl-futures-betting/" target="_blank">NHL futures odds</a> at NHL Betting Tips to see if you can make some big cash off of your favourite teams.  The basketball season is also coming to a close so I&#8217;d suggest checking out the <a href="http://www.nbaodds.org" target="_blank">NBA odds</a> for the playoffs or the <a href="http://www.nbabettinglines.org" target="_blank">NBA betting</a> lines for each game to see who has the best chance to take down the NBA championships this season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-midseason-playoff-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teams Cannot Afford to Fall Behind in New NHL</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/teams-cannot-afford-to-fall-behind-in-new-nhl/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/teams-cannot-afford-to-fall-behind-in-new-nhl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Maple Leafs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is still very early in the NHL regular season, but teams that are falling behind now are quickly putting themselves out of playoff contention.  With the parody in the league these days and the extra overtime/shootout points teams that fall behind early in the season really put themselves up against the wall in terms [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is still very early in the NHL regular season, but teams that are falling behind now are quickly putting themselves out of playoff contention.  With the parody in the league these days and the extra overtime/shootout points teams that fall behind early in the season really put themselves up against the wall in terms of coming from behind and grabbing a playoff spot.  I saw it last year with my Ottawa Senators.  The Sens started off slow and then they were fighting a losing battle all year long.  Even a huge three week span to start March where the Sens earned 18 of a possible 22 points didn&#8217;t event put the Senators within a reasonable striking distance of a playoff birth.  I&#8217;m writing this article because I keep hearing fans of teams low in the standings talking about how their team has a legitimate shot at the playoffs.  It&#8217;s getting to that time of year where teams are already finding themselves out of the hunt.</p>
<p>Take the Toronto Maple Leafs for example.  Leaf fans are the worst.  Most of them probably still think their team is going to win the Stanley Cup this year.  The will say things like, &#8220;we are just 7 points out of the playoffs.  That&#8217;s just four wins.&#8221;  But the truth is that&#8217;s four wins for the Leafs, four losses for the 8th place team, three losses for the ninth, tenth and eleventh place teams, and two losses for the 12th placed team.  That equals out to 19 games having to go as planned, and a lot of the time that&#8217;s just not possible because these teams that have to lose will likely be playing each other.  Not to mention that these losses have to be in regulation.  The extra point makes it even more difficult for teams to come from behind to make playoffs because even when teams ahead of them are losing they will still be receiving a single point many of these times.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at this logically.  I think even fans making these outrageous <a href="http://www.nhlpredictions.org/" target="_blank">NHL predictions</a> in favour of their favourite team can agree that a playoff team needs 90 points at an absolute minimum.  The average of the two 8th placed teams last season was 92 so we will use that number to make our following calculations.  The Maple Leafs currently have 25 points in 29 games.  This means that they need to earn, at an absolute minimum, 67 points in their remaining 53 games.  That is an average of 1.265 points per game.  So far this season, only the top 6 teams in the league have a point % greater than 1.265.  To put it into perspective at an absolute minimum, the Leafs would have to win about 31 of their last 53 games, lose 17 in regulation and lose 5 in OT/SO.  Does anyone really think the Maple Leafs can be a top 6 NHL team for the last two-thirds of the season?  I certainly don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Once a team falls behind in this new NHL where the teams are all very equal and many games award the loser a point it is very difficult to make up any ground.  The games at this time of year are extremely important, so if your team is starting to fall off the pace, I advise you to treat every game like it&#8217;s the playoffs and watch it intently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/teams-cannot-afford-to-fall-behind-in-new-nhl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mikko Koivu is a 70+ Point Center</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/mikko-koivu-is-a-70-point-center/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/mikko-koivu-is-a-70-point-center/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mikko Koivu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winter Olympics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mikko Koivu is the younger brother of Saku Koivu and currently the top player on the struggling Minnesota Wild.  Me and a buddy were arguing recently about whether Koivu is a keeper in our hockey pool.  I say he is a definite keeper because he will get between 70 and 80 points for the next [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikko Koivu is the younger brother of Saku Koivu and currently the top player on the struggling Minnesota Wild.  Me and a buddy were arguing recently about whether Koivu is a keeper in our hockey pool.  I say he is a definite keeper because he will get between 70 and 80 points for the next several season, while my buddy says he is only a 60 point guy.</p>
<p>Koivu has been improving ever since he entered the NHL leading up to his 67 point performance last season over 79 games.  This season he already has 16 points in 17 games, which means he is on pace for 77 points.  Not to mention he has been doing this on a struggling Minnesota Wild team that is 5th worst in the league in goals per game.  The Wild are starting to pick up their game and perform closer to their potential, which is battling for the final playoff spot in the West.  When the team gets going, you can expet Koivu to at least match his current production if not increase it.</p>
<p>Mikko plays in all situations for the Wild and averages around 19 minutes a game, which is a very good amount for a forward in the NHL.  He is on the first powerplay unit and will be played in all key situations when the team needs goals.  Koivu was recently named the captain of the team and so far he has handled this responsibility extremely well and his production and the teams improvement are both proof of this.</p>
<p>I consider Mikko one of the top 10 centers in the game and I&#8217;m sure he will be a force for Finland at the Olympics this winter.  Finland doesn&#8217;t have great odds when it comes to <a href="http://www.winterolympicsbetting.com" target="_blank">winter olympics betting</a>, but they definitely have a shot with Koivu leading them.  You can bet on Finland or any other team at BetCRIS.  Just make sure you use a <a href="http://www.betcrisbonuscode.net/" target="_blank">BetCRIS bonus code</a> when signing up in order to receive the best initial deposit bonus available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/mikko-koivu-is-a-70-point-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s autumn and the Leafs are falling.</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/its-autumn-and-the-leafs-are-falling/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/its-autumn-and-the-leafs-are-falling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 05:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Larose</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Maple Leafs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know this topic is very controversial because the Leafs are one of the most popular teams in the league, but it is time to face the facts that our beloved Leafs are falling quickly.  After have a mediocre 6-3 record in the pre-season, the Leafs have failed to win a single game two weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this topic is very controversial because the Leafs are one of the most popular teams in the league, but it is time to face the facts that our beloved Leafs are falling quickly.  After have a mediocre 6-3 record in the pre-season, the Leafs have failed to win a single game two weeks into the season.  Starting 0-5-1 was not what I was expecting when Burke promised us Leaf fans a better season this year.  Now I know that it is early in the season, and that the Leafs have not played their best hockey so far, but they are currently the laughing stock of the NHL at this point being placed 30th out of a possible 30.  Now you&#8217;re probably saying that this guy is not a Leafs fan, but I am, and have been for as long as I could remember.  Right now I am an upset Leafs fan, waiting for the Leafs to start winning some games.  Now people are probably saying, &#8220;wait till Phil Kessel comes back from injury&#8221;.  Why did the Leafs trade away two first-round picks and a second round pick for a guy who has never gotten more then 60 points (which was last season, and 37 points the year before) and pay him 27 million over 5 years?  Because the Leafs like to pay players more then they are actually worth.  Let&#8217;s just take a look at the Leafs defensive line-up.  Only one guy on their defensive line-up should be making more then 4 million dollars, and that guy is undoubtedly Tomas Kaberle.  Before being signed by the Leafs last season to a 3.5 million dollars a year contract, Jeff Finger had played 94 regular season games in the NHL.  Does 94 nhl games provide a new team with experience or even promise of being good?  The reason I point this out is because the Leafs pay guys like this that kind of money when guys such as Dennis Wideman, Brent Seabrook and Cam Barker or making the same type of money.  The reason I bring this up is that the Leafs always over-pay their players after a strong season instead of bringing in solid individuals that can do the job for less and bring in big NHL names like free agents during this summer Marian Gaborik, Martin Havlat or even Marian Hossa.   This is the first of many articles if the Leafs do not decide to pick up their act and start playing real hockey.</p>
<p>Yours truly,</p>
<p>F***ING PISSED OFF LEAF FAN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/its-autumn-and-the-leafs-are-falling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL 2008-2009 Standings Using 3-Point System</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-2008-2009-standings-using-3-point-system/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-2008-2009-standings-using-3-point-system/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3-point system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL point system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL standings 08-09]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m a big believer in the NHL switching over to a 3-point system that awards 3 points for regulation wins, 2 points for overtime/shootout wins, 1 point for overtime/shootout losses and nothing for regulation losses.
I feel that the current system of awarding 2 points some games and 3 points others is completely ridiculous because it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a big believer in the NHL switching over to a 3-point system that awards 3 points for regulation wins, 2 points for overtime/shootout wins, 1 point for overtime/shootout losses and nothing for regulation losses.</p>
<p>I feel that the current system of awarding 2 points some games and 3 points others is completely ridiculous because it encourages regulation ties and makes it difficult for teams to gain any ground in the standings during the playoff races.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to be adding a detailed article outline why I think the NHL should make the switch to the 3-point system in the near future.  In the mean time I have done some research and analyzed how the standings would have looked last year had the 3-point system been used:</p>
<h2>Eastern Conference</h2>
<h2>Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System</h2>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-180 aligncenter" title="Eastern Conference Standings" src="http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Eastern-Conference-Standings.jpg" alt="Eastern Conference Standings" width="361" height="375" /></p>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 392pt;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="522">
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="5" width="64"></col>
<col style="width: 56pt;" width="74"></col>
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="2" width="64"></col>
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt; width: 48pt;" width="64" height="20"></td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Team</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">GP</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Wins</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">OT Wins</td>
<td style="width: 56pt;" width="74">OT Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Points</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">1</td>
<td>Boston</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">46</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">19</td>
<td align="right">162</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">2</td>
<td>Washington</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">40</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">148</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">3</td>
<td>New Jersey</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">37</td>
<td align="right">14</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">27</td>
<td align="right">143</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">4</td>
<td>Philadelphia</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">34</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">27</td>
<td align="right">133</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">5</td>
<td>Carolina</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">132</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">6</td>
<td>Pittsburgh</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">28</td>
<td align="right">132</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">7</td>
<td>Florida</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">34</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">127</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">8</td>
<td>New York Rangers</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">13</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">125</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">9</td>
<td>Montreal</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">123</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">10</td>
<td>Buffalo</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right">122</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">11</td>
<td>Ottawa</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">29</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">112</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">12</td>
<td>Toronto</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">13</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">105</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">13</td>
<td>Atlanta</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">41</td>
<td align="right">100</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">14</td>
<td>Tampa Bay</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">19</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">18</td>
<td align="right">40</td>
<td align="right">85</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">15</td>
<td>New York Islanders</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">20</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">47</td>
<td align="right">81</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see using the 3-point system would have made some significant changes in the Eastern Conference.  Most notably, the Florida Panthers would have finished seventh with 127 points, passing the New York Rangers and pushing the Montreal Canadiens out of the playoffs.  The Habs played 22 overtime/shootout games in 08-09 and this played a major role in allowing them to sneak into the 8th playoff spot in the East.  Another change would be the Penguins falling from 4th to 6th position.  This would have meant that the Penguins play the New Jersey Devils in the first round of the playoffs, which could have caused the entire Stanley Cup run to play out differently.  Most people would agree at the Panthers deserved to be in the playoffs and likely would have put up more of a fight than the Canadiens.</p>
<h2>Western Conference</h2>
<h2>Standings Using Current System vs Standings Using 3-Point System</h2>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-181" title="Western Conference" src="http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Western-Conference.jpg" alt="Western Conference" width="366" height="378" /></p>
<table style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 392pt;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="522">
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="5" width="64"></col>
<col style="width: 56pt;" width="74"></col>
<col style="width: 48pt;" span="2" width="64"></col>
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt; width: 48pt;" width="64" height="20"></td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64"></td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">GP</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Wins</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">OT Wins</td>
<td style="width: 56pt;" width="74">OT Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Losses</td>
<td style="width: 48pt;" width="64">Points</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">1</td>
<td>San Jose</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">44</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">18</td>
<td align="right">161</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">2</td>
<td>Detroit</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">42</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">21</td>
<td align="right">154</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">3</td>
<td>Calgary</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">40</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">6</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">138</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">4</td>
<td>Chicago</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">36</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">24</td>
<td align="right">140</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">5</td>
<td>Vancouver</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">37</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">27</td>
<td align="right">137</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">6</td>
<td>St. Louis</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">123</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">7</td>
<td>Columbus</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">10</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">123</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">8</td>
<td>Minnesota</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">122</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">9</td>
<td>Anaheim</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">30</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">33</td>
<td align="right">121</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">10</td>
<td>Nashville</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">28</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">34</td>
<td align="right">116</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">11</td>
<td>Edmonton</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">31</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">9</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">116</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">12</td>
<td>Phoenix</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right">4</td>
<td align="right">7</td>
<td align="right">39</td>
<td align="right">111</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">13</td>
<td>Dallas</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">25</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">35</td>
<td align="right">108</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">14</td>
<td>Los Angeles</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">26</td>
<td align="right">8</td>
<td align="right">11</td>
<td align="right">37</td>
<td align="right">105</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height: 15pt;" height="20">
<td style="height: 15pt;" height="20" align="right">15</td>
<td>Colorado</td>
<td align="right">82</td>
<td align="right">20</td>
<td align="right">12</td>
<td align="right">5</td>
<td align="right">45</td>
<td align="right">89</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Using the 3-point system, the Minnesota Wild would have squeaked into the 8th place spot and the Anaheim Mighty Ducks would have missed the playoffs but 1 point.  If that&#8217;s not a good race then I don&#8217;t know what is.  Sixth through ninth in the West has only a 2 point difference in the West.  This was a 4 point difference using the current system and it&#8217;s much more difficult to make up points the way points are currently allotted.  So there goes the argument that the playoff races would be less exciting with the 3-point system.  Both Nashville and Edmonton would have been in it right to the end as well with 116 points a piece.  The only other change the 3-point system would have made is Calgary and Vancouver switching places (but they would both have likely still lost to Havlat and the &#8216;Hawks anyways <img src='http://hockeyopinions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ).</p>
<p>As you can see the 3-point system isn&#8217;t going to drastically change the standings.  However, it is the fairer way to award points and the slight differences would have been huge for both Florida and Minnesota who really each deserved to be in the playoffs based on their records.  Minnesota played in 3 less overtime games than the Ducks and Florida played in 4 fewer OT games than the Habs.  The current NHL point system is supposedly rewarding competition, but in reality it is rewarding mediocrity.  The teams that play for a tie are rewarded, while the teams that play for the win are penalized.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for now.  I&#8217;ll have another post on this topic within the few days outlining why the NHL should switch to the 3-point system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-2008-2009-standings-using-3-point-system/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Martin Havlat will get Over 80 Points this Season</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/martin-havlat-will-get-over-80-points-this-season/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/martin-havlat-will-get-over-80-points-this-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Havlat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Richards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me and my buddy made a bet how many points Havlat will get this season.  The over/under was 79.5, with a condition that he plays at least 75 games.
I feel that this condition really puts the bet in my favour.  Havlat has been a point a game guy with both the Senators and the Blackhawks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me and my buddy made a bet how many points Havlat will get this season.  The over/under was 79.5, with a condition that he plays at least 75 games.</p>
<p>I feel that this condition really puts the bet in my favour.  Havlat has been a point a game guy with both the Senators and the Blackhawks and in Minnesota he will be looked to for even more offense as the go to guy.  Havlat was only playing around 15 minutes a game in Chicago because they were such a deep team that liked to run through their lines, but in Minnesota the depth isn&#8217;t there quite the same.  Havlat will be relied on to carry most of the offensive load and I for one feel he is up to the challenge.</p>
<p>By taking out the injury risk factor, that as we all know is a big risk when it comes to Havlat, it seems to me he has the skill and the role to put up huge numbers this season.  Coach Todd Richards has been preaching about offense and playing an attacking style.  So far the Wild haven&#8217;t been able to fully forget their defensive culture and embrace Richards plans, but this should happen in the near future and I think Havlat will be one of the main beneficiaries.</p>
<p>If you have Havlat in your hockey pool this season, congratulations because he is going to put up some big numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/martin-havlat-will-get-over-80-points-this-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Regular Season Predictions &#8211; 09/10</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-regular-season-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-regular-season-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane Zurbrigg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[09/10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anaheim Ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Thrashers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Sabres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calgary Flames]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado Avalanche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbus Blue Jackets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton Oilers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal Canadiens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nashville Predators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Islanders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Rangers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa Senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philadelphia Flyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phoenix Coyotes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regular Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose Sharks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Blues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Lightning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Maple Leafs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Canucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Capitals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[East
The Contenders
1. Pittsburgh Penguins
I see no reason why the Penguins won’t follow up on last year’s Stanley Cup win with another very good regular season. Crosby and Malkin will be as good as ever, if not better. As well, though Fleury has taken a fair bit of criticism in the past, I think that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>East</h1>
<h2>The Contenders</h2>
<p>1. Pittsburgh Penguins</p>
<p>I see no reason why the Penguins won’t follow up on last year’s Stanley Cup win with another very good regular season. Crosby and Malkin will be as good as ever, if not better. As well, though Fleury has taken a fair bit of criticism in the past, I think that the Cup win really cemented some of the confidence that he’s been building, and I’d expect an excellent campaign out of him. The Penguin’s defense, led by Sergei Gonchar and Brooks Orpik, isn’t exceptionally good, but it’ll get the job done. Crosby and Malkin are too competitive to be complacent after their Cup win, and they’ll help the team avoid the typical &#8216;Cup hangover’.</p>
<p>2. Washington Capitals</p>
<p>The Capitals are full of young talent that’s only getting better, and they will seriously challenge the Penguins for the Eastern Conference Title this year. Expect another amazing year from Ovechkin, and if his supporting cast steps up and Varlamov proves to be a solid NHL netminder, this team has a good shot at the Cup. Certainly, big years are needed and expected from Mike Green and Alexander Semin, and that should give the Capitals one of the most explosive offenses in the league.</p>
<p>3. Boston Bruins</p>
<p>The best defensive team in the league last year, the Bruins should excel at the defensive end again this year. As well, though Tim Thomas may regress slightly from his Vezina form of last year, he still figures to be one of the NHL’s best goalies. The Bruins won’t score a ton of goals, but the forward corps, led by Marc Savard, Milan Lucic and David Krejci, will be good enough for the stingy Bruins to stay among the league’s elite teams.</p>
<p>4. Philadelphia Flyers</p>
<p>The Flyers, full of good young talent including Mike Richards and Jeff Carter, should be among the East’s best teams. However, they’ll be caught behind the Penguins in the Atlantic and will thus have to settle for 4<sup>th</sup> in the East. Chris Pronger will shore up a solid defense and provide leadership, pushing the Flyers into the mix for the East Crown. However, the Flyers will be relying on Ray Emery in net, and that’s always a risky proposition. Until they solidify their goaltending situation, the Flyers will have difficulties matching up with the beasts of the East &#8211; Boston, Pittsburgh and Washington.</p>
<h2>The Pretenders</h2>
<p>5. New Jersey Devils</p>
<p>I was torn over what to do with the Devils. Every year they are expected to crumble in the face of off-season losses, yet they always manage to contend in the Eastern Conference, though playoff success has eluded them for the past few years. Without some major changes, the end is nearing for this Devils team, as successful as it has been for the past decade. Nonetheless, they’ll play excellent defensive hockey in front of Brodeur this year, and they’ll manage to make the playoffs, though they won’t be putting pressure on the East’s elite.</p>
<p>6. Carolina Hurricanes</p>
<p>The Hurricanes, after last year’s surprising run to the Eastern Finals, will be good again this year. Led by Eric Staal and backed by Cam Ward, expect the ‘Canes to put together a solid, if unspectacular, season. Unfortunately, they’re simply not quite as good as the Penguins, Bruins and Capitals, and they&#8217;re going to have a hard time duplicating last year’s playoff success.</p>
<p>7. Toronto Maple Leafs</p>
<p>Brian Burke has his fingerprints all over this team, and the resulting ‘Bay Street Bullies’ are an odd team. Though they lack star power up front, they still managed to finish 10<sup>th</sup> in the NHL in scoring last year, and Phil Kessel will only make this forward unit better. The worst defensive team in the league last year, they figure to be far better in 09/10 with the additions of Beauchemin and Komisarek, in particular. Goaltending will make or break this team – Vesa Toskala was awful last year, and if he’s in better form this year, backed up by Jonas Gustavsson, then the Leafs should have some success. I think the tandem will be respectable, and the Leafs should squeak into the playoffs. However, this is still a mediocre hockey team that has a long way to go before any Cup parades should be planned.</p>
<p>8. Montreal Canadiens</p>
<p>The Habs look rather different from the team swept out of the first round by the Bruins last year. Though they’ll miss Kovalev, Mike Cammalleri will be a more-than-adequate, if less flashy, replacement. Scott Gomez is a risky acquisition, and I would be very surprised if he lived up to his rather large contract. Offense wasn’t an issue last year though, and it won’t be this year. Komisarek will be missed, and aside from Andre Markov, the team’s defense will not be its strongest point. Carey Price should be solid, which will reinforce the team’s weak defense. The Habs are flawed, but they should make the playoffs, though a deep run is not in the cards.</p>
<p>9. Ottawa Senators</p>
<p>The Sens are a difficult team to figure out. Losing Dany Heatley will hurt, but Bryan Murray, considering the circumstances, did net a decent return in exchange for the disgruntled star. Jonathan Cheechoo was a throw-in in the deal; It is Milan Michalek who the Sens really wanted, and rightfully so. Young and skilled, Michalek should be a big asset to the team for years to come. The Sens’ offense should be far more balanced than it has in the past decade, making it for more difficult on opposing teams to shut them down. If Pascal Leclaire is the solid goalie the Sens have long been looking for, then expect the Senators to be back in the playoffs this year. Though I have them barely missing the playoffs, they could easily finish as high as 5<sup>th</sup> in the conference.</p>
<p>10. Buffalo Sabres</p>
<p>The Sabres did little this offseason, and will in all likelihood miss the playoffs like they did last year. There’s a shortage of talent up front here, even if first line centre Tim Connolly is healthy. Thomas Vanek will have to be brilliant offensively to keep the team afloat. Ryan Miller should be solid in net, as always. Losing Jaroslav Spacek to the Canadiens, though, will hurt the weak Sabres’ D. The Sabres will be in playoff contention, but will probably end up watching the playoff dance.</p>
<p>11. New York Rangers</p>
<p>The Rangers will be solid this year, but without a healthy Marian Gaborik this team is short on skill, and will probably miss the playoffs. When healthy, Gaborik is one of the game’s premier scorers. However, staying healthy has been a huge issue for the star, and I would be very surprised to see him play more than 70 games. The Rangers were awful last year offensively, and that doesn’t figure to change this year, even if they play aggressive John Tortorella-style hockey. Henrik Lundqvist will be good, as always, but even he can only do so much.</p>
<p>12. Florida Panthers</p>
<p>After almost squeaking into the playoffs last year, the Panthers seem due to disappoint this year. Despite the best efforts of sophomore coach Peter DeBoer, I just don’t see enough talent on this roster for them to stay ahead of the teams above and earn a playoff spot. They won’t be awful like the teams below them, but the playoffs are a stretch, barring significant improvement from players such as Nathan Horton and Stephen Weiss, both of whom were once though to be premier prospects but have failed to live up to expectations.</p>
<h2>The Hopeless</h2>
<p>13. Tampa Bay Lightning</p>
<p>Some are predicting a playoff berth is in order for the Lightning this year, but I don’t see it happening. Bringing in Ohlund from Vancouver was a good move, and Victor Hedman should be able to step in and be a capable player from the start, which will bolster their blueline. They’ve got plenty of talent up front in Vinny Lecavalier, Martin St. Louis and the emerging Steven Stamkos. Nonetheless, I’m not sold on Mike Smith as a solid NHL number one goalie, and I lack faith in the abilities of Rich Tocchet. I’d be surprised if the Lightning put it all together like many predict they will. I expect that they’ll be a mess and end up near the East’s basement again.</p>
<p>14. New York Islanders</p>
<p>I have no idea what GM Garth Snow is doing with this team. Backing up Rick DiPietro with one of either Martin Biron or Dwayne Roloson might not have been a bad idea, but bringing both in is a rather strange move. Tavares will bolster a weak Isles’ offense, but he won’t be enough. Goals will be at a premium in Long Island this year. There’s little to be excited about defensively, too. On the whole, this simply isn’t a particularly talented roster, and the Isles have a long way to go before they can even think about the playoffs.</p>
<p>15. Atlanta Thrashers</p>
<p>The Thrashers have never won a playoff game. Don’t expect that to change this year. It’ll be a messy, messy year in Atlanta, and look for Ilya Kovalchuk’s imprending free agency to overshadow whatever the Thrashers are doing on the ice. That might not be a bad thing, though, as the Thrashers will be brutal this year. Former Leafs Pavel Kubina and Nik Antropov are solid additions, and underrated Bryan Little should have another good year. Kovalchuk should produce huge numbers, as he’s playing for a new contract, and he’ll be an explosive offensive force, as always. Nonetheless, there’s a lack of depth on the roster, and a big hole in net. Kari Lehtonen simply hasn’t proven himself to be a particularly good goaltender, and I’d be surprised if he suddenly put it together this year. He’s got a young defense in front of him, too, and that means that a lot of pucks are going to end up in Atlanta’s net. Expect another bad year for the Thrashers, on and off the ice.</p>
<h1>West<span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 13px;"> </span></h1>
<h2>The Contenders</h2>
<p>1. Detroit Red Wings</p>
<p>The Wings will miss Hossa and Hudler, but this team is still far too talented to slip much. Zetterberg and Datsyuk are two of the league’s best offensive players, they still have Lidstrom and Rafalski on the blueline, and Osgood will be strong in the crease. The Wings’ core is one of the best in the league, and there’s no reason to think that they won’t be once again competing for the President’s Trophy.</p>
<p>2. San Jose Sharks</p>
<p>Heatley and Thornton will be phenomenal together. Heatley should be a 50 goal scorer again, and Thornton should get back to scoring 100+ points. Though perhaps not the best leader, Patrick Marleau will still provide lots of secondary scoring, and the Sharks will be an offensive powerhouse. The ageless Rob Blake and Dan Boyle lead a capable Sharks defensive corps, and Evgeni Nabokov should be solid in net. The Sharks are no strangers to regular season success, but the playoffs are a different story. Questions about tenacity and leadership will continue to plague the team, but they’ll post a solid regular season record, though it remains to be seen whether the team can win when it counts.</p>
<p>3. Vancouver Canucks</p>
<p>The Flames will challenge the Canucks for the Northwest Division lead, but I expect the ‘Nucks to pull it out. Captain Roberto Luongo should bounce back from the shelling he took in Vancouver’s season-ending loss to the Blackhawks in the 2<sup>nd</sup> round last year. In front of him is a solid if unspectacular defense, only made better by the addition of Mathieu Schneider. Up front they lack the star power of other contenders, but the Sedin twins lead a solid contingent of forwards that will get the job done. The Canucks are one of the West’s best teams, but I think that they still need to add one elite player to put them over the top.</p>
<p>4. Chicago Blackhawks</p>
<p>The Blackhawks are young and extremely talented. Adding Hossa to an already excellent offense makes them one of the league’s best offensive teams, and they’ll score a ton of goals. The team’s defense is also among the league’s best, led by criminally underrated Duncan Keith, who has Brian Campbell, Brent Seabrook and Cam Barker with him on the blueline. The only question mark facing the ‘Hawks is in the crease. Is Cristobal Huet good enough to be Chicago’s unquestioned number one goalie? I don’t think so. Expect the Hawks to be extremely good, but the lack of a proven goaltender prevents the team from being a favourite to win the Cup.</p>
<p>5. Calgary Flames</p>
<p>Led by one of hockey’s best, Jarome Iginla, the Flames figure to be among the West’s best teams. The loss of Mike Cammalleri will hurt on offense, but the team does have enough scoring to get by. Olli Jokinen needs to step up and get back to being a point-per-game player for the Flames to really be a threat. Adding Jay Bouwmeester gives the Flames one of the league’s best defenses, and that can only help Kiprusoff. The Flames will be extremely stingy. All this adds up to an excellent season, and I think the Flames will also make noise in the playoffs this year.</p>
<h2><strong>The Pretenders</strong></h2>
<p>6. Anaheim Ducks</p>
<p>The Ducks took an excellent San Jose squad out of the playoff picture last year, and their tough style of play will once again lead to success this year. Getzlaf, Perry and Teemu Selanne lead a solid offense. The loss of Chris Pronger leaves a big hole on the Ducks blueline, but the addition of Ryan Whitney will certainly help fill that hole, and the team will still be good defensively.The goaltending situation is a little dicey in Anaheim – who will be the team’s #1, Jonas Hiller or Jean-Sebastian Giguere? Hiller was the better goalie last year, and was excellent in the playoffs. I’d expect the two to split the load until one or the other asserts himself as the clearcut number one, at which point the other will probably be traded, as there’s always a market for good goalies.</p>
<p>7. Minnesota Wild</p>
<p>This isn’t the most talented roster in the world, but the Wild play a damn good team game and will most likely sneak into the playoffs in a tight race. Havlat will give the team a boost on offense, though the team still won’t score a ton of goals. Nonetheless, their solid defense and goaltending will keep them in most games, which means that the offense doesn’t have to be spectacular. They won’t be competing for the West title, but a playoff appearance is likely.</p>
<p>8. Los Angeles Kings</p>
<p>The Kings, after a long, long stretch of terrible hockey, appear poised to finally begin contending again. The addition of solid veterans like playoff hero Rob Scuderi and ‘Captain Canada’ Ryan Smyth will strengthen a roster filled with young talent. Anze Kopitar, Alexander Frolov and Dustin Brown will lead an explosive Kings offense. Questions remain about the team’s overall defensive ability, and the team is relying on Jonathan Bernier to emerge as a bonafide NHL #1 goalie. I think it should all come together for the Kings, and they should find themselves playing playoff hockey for the first time in six seasons.</p>
<p>9. St. Louis Blues</p>
<p>After a surprising playoff appearance last year, the Blues will compete for a playoff spot again this year. I think they’ll miss out, but it’ll be tight. The offense should be good, led by Paul Kariya, Brad Boyes and Patrik Berglund. Defense and goaltending should also be decent, buoyed by the return of Erik Johnson. Chris Mason has to be as good as he was last year to keep the Blues in the race out west. Ultimately, I think they’ll just fall short of the playoffs, but it will be close.</p>
<p>10. Edmonton Oilers</p>
<p>Pat Quinn is back in the NHL, and he’s leading an Oilers team that hasn’t made the playoffs since their Finals appearance in 05/06. Fans are hungry in Edmonton, but I think the playoff drought will continue for another year. The offense is young and deep, but there’s a lack of first line talent. Defense is a bit of a weakness, though Khabibulin will be solid in net. Unfortunately for the Oilers, I just don’t see room for them in the playoffs.</p>
<p>11. Columbus Blue Jackets</p>
<p>Steve Mason’s amazing rookie season led the Blue Jackets to their first ever playoff berth last year, but I’m not sure that they’ll be in the playoff dance again this year. Rick Nash is in Columbus long term, and he’ll lead a capable offense again this year. The defense isn’t great, but as long as Mason is strong in net again, the Blue Jackets will be decent. Still, though, I don’t see the Blue Jackets growing playoff beards again this year.</p>
<p>12. Dallas Stars</p>
<p>The Stars have slowly slipped out of the West’s elite, and they missed the playoffs last year. I see that slide continuing this season, and I don’t think the Stars will be competing for a playoff spot. The team still has talent up front in Brendan Morrow, Brad Richards and Mike Ribeiro. The defense is unproven and looks weak, though, which means that Marty Turco will have to be at his best as a lot of rubber comes his way.</p>
<p>13. Nashville Predators</p>
<p>Nashville will boast an excellent defense this year, led by Shea Weber, but the rest of the team looks shaky. The offense will be relying on aging veterans such as Jason Arnott and Steve Sullivan, and scoring goals won’t be easy for this team. Pekka Rinne and Dan Ellis will be between the pipes for Nashville, and though Rinne wasn’t bad last year for the Preds, I’m not sure that he’ll be good enough to keep the team in contention for a playoff spot this year.</p>
<h2><strong>The Hopeless</strong></h2>
<p>14. Colorado Avalanche</p>
<p>After a long stretch of success under captain Joe Sakic, things finally gave last year, and the Avs are now rebuilding. They have some good young players that provide hope for the future, but this season will be a rough one in Denver. Throughout the lineup there’s a shortage of skill, and the Avs simply won’t be able to compete most nights. Goaltending is also a major issue – Peter Budaj has been able to get the job done the past few years, but he’s no Patrick Roy. It’ll be a long year for the Avalanche and their fans, and there’s little hope for the near future.</p>
<p>15. Phoenix Coyotes</p>
<p>The Coyotes are a mess, on and off the ice. They’re without a coach after Wayne Gretzky’s departure, fans in Phoenix don’t seem to care about the team, as they figure that it’s only a matter of time before the Coyotes end up in Hamilton. Of course, though, the only man who has expressed interest in buying the team, Jim Balsillie, is considered a villain among NHL owners and the NHL is hellbent on ensuring that he doesn’t end up owning the team. On the ice the situation isn’t much better. After captain Shane Doan, the Coyotes are extremely thin up front, and also weak on defense. Ilja Bryzgalov provides some stability in goal, and should still post good numbers this year, though he won’t be rewarded with many wins. This is going to be an ugly year for the Coyotes, though there may not be many people in the Jobing.com Arena to watch the Coyotes lose.</p>
<h2>Individual Awards</h2>
<p>Hart – Alex Ovechkin, Washington Capitals</p>
<p>This is Ovechkin’s trophy to lose. Though Malkin and Crosby are serious competition for the award, the fact that they both play for a loaded Penguins squad will always hurt their chances for the Hart. Though the Capitals are a deeper team than they’ve been in the past, there is still little doubt that they are Ovechkin’s team. I expect 60 goals and 60 assists from him this season, and that will be enough for Ovechkin to hold on to the Hart for another year.</p>
<p>Vezina – Martin Brodeur, New Jersey Devils</p>
<p>Though Brodeur is 37, I think he still has at least one more elite season left in him. Given that New Jersey lost several key players this offseason, Brodeur will be more important to the team than ever. Brodeur will keep the New Jersey Devils in the Eastern conference’s upper echelon, and he’ll take home a 5<sup>th</sup> Vezina for his efforts.</p>
<p>Norris – Nicklas Lidstrom, Detroit Red Wings</p>
<p>Though he’ll face stiff competition from Mike Green, Duncan Keith and Zdeno Chara, Lidstrom is still the most complete defenseman in the league. Green will be an offensive force with the Capitals, but isn’t solid enough in his own zone to win the Norris. Keith will continue to improve after a breakout season last year, but still isn’t quite as good as Lidstrom. Chara will continue to lead a very stingy Bruins team, but I don’t expect the Bruins to be as good as they were last year, and that will affect his standing with voters. Though Lidstrom, like Brodeur, is nearing the end of an illustrious career, he’s still the NHL’s best blueliner, and he’ll take home his 7<sup>th</sup> Norris trophy this year as a result.</p>
<p>Selke – Mike Richards, Philadelphia Flyers</p>
<p>Richards is an amazingly complete player. He plays hard at both ends of the ice and makes life difficult for opposing forwards. Though not as flashy as Pavel Datsyuk, Richards’ solid defensive play should go over well with Selke voters.</p>
<p>Calder – John Tavares, New York Islanders</p>
<p>Though Tavares won’t be an instant superstar in the mold of Alex Ovechkin and Sidney Crosby, I do expect a very solid rookie season from him. He’ll get lots of ice time on a bad Islanders team, and I’d expect him to pot 30 goals to go with 40 helpers, which should be more than enough to make him the NHL’s top rookie.</p>
<p>Jack Adams -  Pat Quinn, Edmonton Oilers</p>
<p>Though I don’t have the Oilers making the playoffs in a tough Western conference, I do think that Pat Quinn will improve this young team. Expect the Oilers to be a much better offensive team under Quinn. After finishing last season 18<sup>th</sup> in goals scored, the Oilers should be in the top third of the league this year, though defensive play will still be a weakness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-regular-season-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stamkos vs Tavares &#8211; Who Will Get More Points?</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/stamkos-vs-tavares-who-will-get-more-points/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/stamkos-vs-tavares-who-will-get-more-points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stamkos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tavares]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Me and Einz were having a little debate the other day about which first overall pick is going to get more points this season.  Stamkos is going into his second full season with the Tampa Bay Lightning after picking up the pace for the latter stages of his rookie campaign.  Tavares on the other hand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me and Einz were having a little debate the other day about which first overall pick is going to get more points this season.  Stamkos is going into his second full season with the Tampa Bay Lightning after picking up the pace for the latter stages of his rookie campaign.  Tavares on the other hand has no NHL experience, but he will be playing all situations for the Islanders and will likely be there go to guy right away.</p>
<p>Me and Einz had varying opinions and eventually a bet was made.  <strong>I took Tavares to get more points this year.</strong></p>
<p>I feel that although Tavares may not be as NHL ready as Stamkos he will be getting more minutes and most importantly more powerplay minutes than the Lightning #1 pick of 2008.  Tavares will likely be playing close to 20 minutes a game from day 1 and will be The Guy on Long Island.  Compare this to Stamkos playing third fiddle to Lecavalier and St. Louis and you can see my point of view on why Tavares will come out on top of this race.</p>
<p>It all comes down to minutes.  If Tavares is getting an extra five mintues a game, he should be able to turn those minutes into a more productive season, even if the Islanders score far less than the Lightning.</p>
<p>Either way, it will be interesting to see how both players fair this season with the spotlight shining on them once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/stamkos-vs-tavares-who-will-get-more-points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackhawks Should Trade Patrick Kane</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/blackhawks-should-trade-patrick-kane/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/blackhawks-should-trade-patrick-kane/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havlat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick Kane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick Kane was recently charged for robbing and abusing a cab driver while home in Buffalo.  This incident once again got me thinking about what a liability Patrick Kane is on such a promising Chicago Blackhawks team.  When a player who is making close to $4,000,000 a year, not including endorsements (Kane is supposed to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick Kane was recently charged for robbing and abusing a cab driver while home in Buffalo.  This incident once again got me thinking about what a liability Patrick Kane is on such a promising Chicago Blackhawks team.  When a player who is making close to $4,000,000 a year, not including endorsements (Kane is supposed to be featured on upcoming video game NHL 10, but who knows if that will last) blows a gasket because a cabbie doesnt have $0.20 in change you have to start questioning his character.</p>
<p>I personally was a Blackhawks fan last year, but I hated watching Patrick Kane on the ice and was very happy when they limited his ice time in the playoffs.  He is a liability on the ice.  What kind of player is a -1 playing on the top line of the 3rd best team in the West from the regular season.  Compare this to my boy Martin Havlat&#8217;s +30 numbers at the same position on the checking line and you will see that Patrick Kane is extremely overrated.  He shouldn&#8217;t have even been mentioned in the same sentence as Havlat.</p>
<p>Now that Havlat is gone I no longer consider myself a Blackhawks fan, but I can see the &#8216;Hawks are in a lot of trouble when it comes to keeping players after this season.  The team is currently almost $5M over the cap for this season and then when you factor in that Toews, Kane and Keith are all restricted free agents next year you have to wonder what Chicago will do.</p>
<p>I think Chicago should trade Kane this year, early in the season and try to get some players who will actually put in what it takes to win.  Sports betting sites have already placed odds on his return next year.  This means backchecking and going into the corners.  Neither of which Kane will do.  Out of the three restricted free agents Kane is the obvious choice not to sign next year because Toews is the captain and will likely be a lifetime &#8216;Hawk and Keith is currently one of the best defensemen in the league.  Why not trade Kane early and actually get something back for him when his stock is relative high.  I have no clue why it would be high because I think Kane is as good as he will ever get and that&#8217;s a guy who can score, but can&#8217;t win.  But if other GM&#8217;s think he has an upside let them take him off the Blackhawks hands and get something in return.</p>
<p>If Stan Bowman can deal Kane for a couple solid players or a goalie depending on how Huet pans out the Blackhawks may have a shot at the cup this year.  If not then I can&#8217;t see them doing any better than last year.  Especially with no Martin Havlat in the line-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/blackhawks-should-trade-patrick-kane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2009-2010 NHL Schedule has been Released</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-2009-2010-nhl-schedule-has-been-released/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-2009-2010-nhl-schedule-has-been-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009-2010 NHL Schedule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL 09-10 Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Schedule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Season Schedule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NHL released their schedule for the 09-10 season today and this unveiling makes the season seem that much closer.  In fact it&#8217;s only a short 2 and a half months away.  The season opens on October 1st 2009, with 4 games.  These games include a couple of hot Canadian rivalries with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NHL released their schedule for the 09-10 season today and this unveiling makes the season seem that much closer.  In fact it&#8217;s only a short 2 and a half months away.  The season opens on October 1st 2009, with 4 games.  These games include a couple of hot Canadian rivalries with the Canadiens visiting the Maple Leafs and the Flames at home to the Canucks.  The other opening games include the Capitals playing the Bruins and the Sharks in Colorado, where the Avalanche will be retiring Sakic&#8217;s number.</p>
<p>Then the traditional overseas games will be held on the 2nd and 3rd of October.  The Red Wings and Blues will face off for a couple games in Stockholm, Sweden, while the Panthers and the Blackhawks will be playing not far away in Helsinki, Finland.</p>
<p>Then the real fun starts on October 3rd with all 30 teams in action.  Look for the Ottawa Senators and the Minnesota &#8220;Martin Havlat&#8221; Wild to start their seasons off with a bang.</p>
<p>The winter classic game has also been announced.  The game will take place on New Years day at Fenway Park in Boston.  The Flyers and Bruins will put on the touques, scarves and tar, as well as strap on the skates for some old time hockey in front of a 100,000 fans.  I&#8217;m hoping to see Bruins forward, Milan Lucic, put Chris Pronger through the glass and over the boards onto the frozen tundra that is Fenway Park field.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s going to be a great year for hockey.  It&#8217;s anyones guess to win the cup and thanks to the parity of the league, everyone has a chance almost every year.  The Olympics will also be a great two week break for players to either represent their country with national pride on the line or rest up for the playoff stretch. <a href="http://hockeyopinions.com"> Hockey Opinions</a> will be covering all of the action with plenty of opinions and biases to be shown.  Check back soon for some early Stanley Cup predictions from our panel of hockey <del datetime="2009-07-16T00:17:59+00:00">experts</del> fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-2009-2010-nhl-schedule-has-been-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals for all the Marbles</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/game-7-of-the-stanley-cup-finals-for-all-the-marbles/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/game-7-of-the-stanley-cup-finals-for-all-the-marbles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup Finals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It all comes down to game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals.  The most important and most exciting game of the year.  The Penguins were able to win all of their home games in this series, but they haven&#8217;t been able to win in Detroit and thanks to the home ice advantage the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all comes down to game 7 of the Stanley Cup Finals.  The most important and most exciting game of the year.  The Penguins were able to win all of their home games in this series, but they haven&#8217;t been able to win in Detroit and thanks to the home ice advantage the Red Wings won during the season, game 7 is back in the Motor City.</p>
<p>Detroit has been amazing at home dominating the 3 games with a combined 11-2 score.  I don&#8217;t expect game 7 to be any different.  Look for Detroit to come out strong with Datsyuk and Zetterberg leading the offense.  Datsyuk had an awesome game 5 and 6 and will light it up in game 7.  Osgood will be ready and he is a clutch goalie.  If he wins this game you have to consider giving him the Conn Smythe.</p>
<p>For Pittsburgh to have a chance Malkin and Crosby need to get going again.  The pair have been held pointless in the last two games and if this happens again the Wings will win easily.  Fleury had a good game, now look for a bad game.  He is just not clutch.  Two silver medals for Team Canada at the World Juniors will tell you that.</p>
<p>Look for Detroit to win game 7 by a final score of 4-1 and Osgood to win the Conn Smythe trophy which he deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/game-7-of-the-stanley-cup-finals-for-all-the-marbles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Stanley Cup Finals Betting</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-stanley-cup-finals-betting/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-stanley-cup-finals-betting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey Betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stanley Cup Finals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rematch has been set.  It&#8217;s the defending Stanley Cup Champions Detroit Red Wings in a rematch with defending and present Eastern Conference Champion Pittsburgh Penguins.  Last year the series took 6 games to decide, but the Wings never looked like they could lose.  This year it&#8217;s basically the same Red Wings team against a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rematch has been set.  It&#8217;s the defending Stanley Cup Champions Detroit Red Wings in a rematch with defending and present Eastern Conference Champion Pittsburgh Penguins.  Last year the series took 6 games to decide, but the Wings never looked like they could lose.  This year it&#8217;s basically the same Red Wings team against a slightly tweaked Penguins team.  The series odds look like this:</p>
<p>Penguins +135<br />
Red Wings -155</p>
<p>The Red Wings are given a slight edge in this series by the bookies, but in my opinion their edge is actually much higher.  The Wings stormed through the Hawks, even without Datsyuk and Lidstrom for a few games in the series.  (Given Havlat and Khabibulin were also out and those 2 are huge parts of the Hawks team).  A few Red Wings including Datsyuk, Holmstrom and even arguably Hossa are still waiting to play their best hockey and when better to play it than the Stanley Cup Finals.  Look for Zetterberg to have another great series, as well as &#8220;The Mule&#8221; Franzen.</p>
<p>Pittsburgh is currently firing on all cylinders riding a 5 game winning streak into the finals and having both Crosby and Malkin finding their A games at the same time.  A good reason for this might be that they were playing defensively challenged teams Washington and Carolina, and an injured Cam Ward.  But you still have to give them credit, especially Malkin, for realy bringing it when it matters.  In my <a href="http://hockeyopinions.com">hockey opinion</a> this level of offense isn&#8217;t going to continue for them against Detroit.  The Wings aren&#8217;t even that great a defensive team, but they will be able to shut down at least one line as long as Lidstrom is healthy.  If the Penguins are going to win they will need an amazing performance from Fleury and both Crosby and Malkin to be firing on all cylinders for the duration of the finals.  The Pens definitely have a better chance than last year, but they are just not good enough to dethrone the champs.</p>
<p><strong>Bet on the Detroit Red Wings </strong>in this series.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong><a href="http://www.bookmaker.com/?cmpid=9808_375">Make your bet now at Bookmaker.com</a><br />
Use <a href="http://bookmakercombonuscode.com">Bookmaker bonus code</a> &#8220;BMBONUS&#8221; when signing up to receive a bonus.</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-stanley-cup-finals-betting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Red Wings vs Ducks Recap and Prediction for the Detroit vs Chicago Blackhawks Conference Finals</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-wings/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-wings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 23:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datsyuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franzen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getzlaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Giguere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Havlat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holmstrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hossa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kronwall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindstrom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maltby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niedermayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osgood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafalski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seabrook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zetterbeg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zetterberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wings and Ducks recap
Well the Wings barely snuck out of this series, but what a series this was.  Starting right off the bat with controversey in game one with the Hudler hit, and then the triple overtime in game two.  Moving to Anaheim we saw the disallowed goal, and then the Wings come back and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Wings and Ducks recap</h3>
<p>Well the Wings barely snuck out of this series, but what a series this was.  Starting right off the bat with controversey in game one with the Hudler hit, and then the triple overtime in game two.  Moving to Anaheim we saw the disallowed goal, and then the Wings come back and chase Hiller out of the net in game 5. Game six saw the Ducks rebound and prevent the Wings from finishing another series out on the road.  Game 7 was the best game seven of these playoff we saw hits, goals, saves, and of course octapi.  With the Wings taking this series they move on to the conferance finals to meet Chicago.</p>
<p>The Wings won this series because of many things.  Firstly Osgood still showed us why he is one of the best playoff goaltenders of all time besting Patrick Roy in goals against average (2.11 Vs. 2.30 in the playoffs), but also following that up with three Stanley Cup Rings.  Beyond the crease Rafalski returned for game 6 and 7 quickly returning to form and moving alongside his usual partner of Lindstrom, thus keeping the other two tandums in tact (Stuart and Kronwall, Lebda and Ericsson).  The Defense played well but Lindstrom couldnt find the offensive production he had in game one, and Rafalski needs to get back on the scoreboard.  Offensively the Wings were terrific all lines were contributing, on both ends of the ice.  Babcock did shuffle the lines successfully to win game 4 moving Franzen with Filpulla and Hossa, while reuniting Datsyuk, Holmstrom and Zetterberg.  This trio didnt stay together long as Holmstrom quickley made his way into the dog house.  Babcock will keep shuffling Holmstrom around till he starts producing.</p>
<p>The Ducks lost for one reason they couldnt find secondary scoring beyond the first line.  Carlyle did shuffle up Getzlaf, Ryan, and Perry but never kep them apart for long.  Selanne did contribute but that was it.  The Ducks were not rolling four lines as well as the Wings were and this tired them out after that long game 2.  The Ducks weren&#8217;t the disciplined team that they needed to be taking stupid penalties throughout the whole series, but luckily the Wings powerplay took a drop without Rafalski in the lineup.  While Hiller shone greatly in this series, he lost his confidence and edge in games 4 and 5 getting chased and letting in nine goals.</p>
<p>Moving on for this Ducks team is this the last game for Selanne, and Niedermayer two future hall of famers?  What happens to Giguere after the emergence of Hiller. What is Anaheim going to do to adress their secondary scoring problems?</p>
<h3>Detroit and Chicago</h3>
<p>This will be another great series.  Detroit beat Chicago in the season series 4-2 including a great Winter Classic showdown.  Both these teams will be energized and ready to play sunday, this two day break, along with the minimal travel time between Chicago and Detroit will keep this a fast paced, high goal scoring series.</p>
<p>Detroit will win because of experiance and depth plain and simple They&#8217;ve been here the last two years and seem better this year then they were last year. All four lines for Detroit are firing, and Detroit still has some players in teh reserve if needed in Maltby, Mcarthy, and Meech.  Homer and Datsyuk will have to come up big this series, they need to revitalize their first line specially against the Keith Seabrook tandum.  The Franzen line will be against Campbell Hjalmarsson which will be tough but Campbell has lost some of his edge in the playoffs, and they haven&#8217;t faced players the likes of Hossa and Franzen yet so that will be an interesting battle.</p>
<p>Chicago  Will need to keep firing, and they have a chance if their secondary scoring comes up big like it did in round two, this is what Anaheim lacked to win.  Khabibulin hasent played as spectacular as Hiller has, but wiht cup experiance he has it in him, so we will see how he performs.  Kane, Toews, and Havlat haven&#8217;t faced a great defensive squad like the Wings so that will be the Hawks biggest test</p>
<h3>Prediction</h3>
<p>I think Detroit takes this in 6, the young Chicago team hasn&#8217;t played at this level yet it will be interesting to see how they react</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-wings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bet on Round 3 Conference Finals of the NHL Playoffs</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/bet-on-round-3-conference-finals-of-the-nhl-playoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/bet-on-round-3-conference-finals-of-the-nhl-playoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet on Round 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference Finals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hockey Betting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, in round 2 I told you 3 teams to bet on.  The Penguins, the Blackhawks and the Bruins.  Two of my three picks came through, but those Bruins couldn&#8217;t beat the Cardiac Canes.  This round the match-ups are very interesting and I hope to pick them both right this time around.
Eastern Conference Finals
Hurricanes +175
Penguins [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in round 2 I told you 3 teams to bet on.  The Penguins, the Blackhawks and the Bruins.  Two of my three picks came through, but those Bruins couldn&#8217;t beat the Cardiac Canes.  This round the match-ups are very interesting and I hope to pick them both right this time around.</p>
<h3>Eastern Conference Finals</h3>
<p>Hurricanes +175<br />
Penguins &#8211; 205</p>
<p>Personally I think this series could go either way.   I would probably give the Pens a small edge, but not as big an edge as these odds are implying they have.  There just seems to be something special about the Hurricanes this year and the big brothers usually win their fights.  Look for Cam Ward to stand on his head and this series to go at least 6 games.   Both of these teams won their second round match ups in 7 and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see this series go the distance as well.  If that is the case it&#8217;s anyones guess who would take it, so go with the underdogs and the good return on your bet because the Canes just don&#8217;t seem like they will lay down at this point.</p>
<p><strong>Bet on Carolina</strong></p>
<h3>Western Conference Finals</h3>
<p>Blackhawks +195<br />
Red Wings -235</p>
<p>This is another series that I think could go either way.  The odds are extremely one sided and I can&#8217;t see any reason for this.  The Blackhawks have had a much tougher road the Conference Finals and will be the first team that will actually test Osgood in net.  The young Blackhawks team has shown a lot of character thus far in the playoffs and they are now my pick to win the cup.  Watch for Havlat to pick it up this series and Kane and Toews to continue their solid play from game 6 of the previous series.  The Wings do have more weapons than either the Flames or the Nucks did, so a lot of pressure will fall on Brian Campbell and Hjalmarsson to shut down the extremely strong second line of the Wings.  We know Keith and Seabrook will do their part on whichever line Quennville feels is most dangerous so it will come down to Campbell and Hjalmarsson having a solid series.  If these two step up and Khabibulin plays a little better than he has so far in the playoffs the Blackhawks will continue on their way to the finals.  I think the series could go either way and for this reason again you should be on the team with the best return on the investment, which in this case is the Blackhawks.</p>
<p><strong>Bet on Chicago.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bookmaker.com/?cmpid=9808_375">Sign up at Bookmaker.com</a> to place your bets and be sure to use <a href="http://bookmakercombonuscode.com">Bookmaker.com bonus code</a> &#8220;BMBONUS&#8221; to receive your initial deposit bonus.</p>
<p>These are my <a href="http://hockeyopinions.com">hockey betting opinions</a>.  Use them wisely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/bet-on-round-3-conference-finals-of-the-nhl-playoffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Delay of Game Over the Glass Penalty is Silly</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-delay-of-game-over-the-glass-penalty-is-silly/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-delay-of-game-over-the-glass-penalty-is-silly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clearing the Puck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delay of Game]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flipping the Puck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Icing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Changing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Over the Glass]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been watching a ton of hockey this playoffs and I have seen way too many delay of game penalties for players shooting the puck over the glass.  Not one of these penalties I saw was intentional and several times these silly over the glass delay of game penalties helped to decide the winning team.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been watching a ton of hockey this playoffs and I have seen way too many delay of game penalties for players shooting the puck over the glass.  Not one of these penalties I saw was intentional and several times these silly over the glass delay of game penalties helped to decide the winning team.  The NHL really needs to take a look at this and reassess the severity of the delay of game penalty for shooting the puck over the glass from the defensive zone.</p>
<p>In my <a href="http://hockeyopinions.com">hockey opinion</a> the NHL should change the rule to be the same as the icing rule, where if a player flips the puck over the boards the penalty is that they are not allowed to change.  It&#8217;s been widely said that the reason this penalty was introduced was because players would flip the puck over the boards when they were tired in order to try to get a change.  This sounds very similar to why players decide to ice the puck.  However the difference is if players flip the puck over the boards they get a two-minute penalty, whereas if they ice the puck they just aren&#8217;t allowed to change.  Players make both plays for the same reason and both plays result in the same outcome of a delay in the game, so in my opinion both plays should be penalized the same way.</p>
<p>The over the glass delay of game penalty was to prevent players from intentionally playing the puck over the glass.  Of course nobody intentionally plays the puck over the glass now, but it still happens because in some cases it is inevitable and it&#8217;s just a few inches between a solid clear off the glass out of danger and a two minute penalty.  By replacing the two minute penalty for clearing the puck over the glass with the current icing rule that players aren&#8217;t allowed to change the NHL will still be able to deter players from intentionally clearing the puck over the glass when they are tired and not risk drastically affecting games from slight misplays.</p>
<p>A perfect example would be when Rick Nash took a penalty for clearing the puck over the glass and Russia went on to score on the powerplay and win the gold over Canada in last years IIHF Hockey Championships.  This is not the way teams should be winning games.  Everyone wants the best team to have the best chance at winning and this penalty only adds variance to the game, which decreases the chances of the right team winning.  I know the NHL wants parity and more goals and awarding silly penalties is one way to get both, but in reality this &#8220;delay of game puck over glass&#8221; penalty is hurting a lot more than it&#8217;s helping.  The penalty was added to do a job.  Now that the NHL has found another way to deter players from delaying the game (not allowing changes) they should quickly do away with this minor penalty and avoid any more controversial finishes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/the-delay-of-game-over-the-glass-penalty-is-silly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Thoughts on The Second Round (And Balsillie)</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/early-toughts-on-the-second-round-and-balsillie/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/early-toughts-on-the-second-round-and-balsillie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 21:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balsillie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Byfuglien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crosby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Datsyuk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hossa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niedermayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osgood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ovechkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This second round of the playoffs is turning out great.  Four good, and hard series being played now, but all eyes are on the Washington Pittsburgh series, and for good reason.  This series is turning into an epic battle between the two best players in the game.  Crosby and Ovechkin are going toe to toe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This second round of the playoffs is turning out great.  Four good, and hard series being played now, but all eyes are on the Washington Pittsburgh series, and for good reason.  This series is turning into an epic battle between the two best players in the game.  Crosby and Ovechkin are going toe to toe in almost every category.  I noted before that perhaps this series can give some leverage in the Ovechkin, Crosby argument, but it seems like the argument won&#8217;t be solved this round.  Now the third best player in the game (Malkin) has been invisible this series he needs to step it up at home for The Pens to have a shot here, otherwise itl be an early exit for The Pens</p>
<p>On The West side of things the Vancouver Chicago series is turning into a good &#8216;greasy&#8217; battle (As Bieksa would put it), these two teams are fighting hard and it will go a long way.  Byfuglien has been working hard in front of Luongo and he might start to be in the goaltenders head, we will see how game 4 plays out.</p>
<p>The Wings series is turning out to be the series with, maybe the most buzz.  First off we have to discuss game one and the antics that took place there.  The Brown hit on Hudler is the most talked about item of that game.  In my opinion it was a dirty hit, but the refs called it right on the ice.  It was a head shot, that was late.  Even though there was no elbow it was a blow to the head, and specifically the type of hit we want out of the game.  Also Brown jumped off the ice to hit the much smaller, and more skilled Hudler.  The emergence of Ericsson has been amazing.  This rookie is playing more minutes a game than the best defensemen in the league (Lidstrom), this will most likely change when Rafalski gets back, but it is nice to see Ericsson play at this level, and even fight with Perry (and win).</p>
<p>Game two saw Rafalski sit out again, and the Wings need him their power play isnt as efficient and they are playing worse.  I always like the long overtime games, and this one wasn&#8217;t any different. Some people are arguing that these overtime game lack in substance, but they are amazing the watch, and also the way the games in the playoffs should be decided.  Even though the Wings lost this one, it was a good game to watch and Hiller deserved the win for the way he played.</p>
<p>Game 3 is where everything spins out of control.  First off the Ducks second goal was interference by Niedermayer.  You can&#8217;t jump on the goalie when he is trying to make a save.  This ticks me off, and surely every Wings fan out there.  Holmstrom gets within an inch of the goalie and gets called for interference, but Niedermayer can jump on the goalie to prevent Osgood from making a goal stopping save?  I fail to see the logic in that.  Now at the end of the game the puck clearly went in before the whistle, but it is intent to blow the whistle that matter, not the actual sound.  Brad Watson  the referee in question was in a horrible position, all the way in the corner when the play was at the net, but Bob Mckenzie said it best on tsn.  Stating that human error will happen by the officials as long as their are human officials and not everything is reviewable.  Now this one will get blow up because of the time, but their is nothing we can do about it now.  The Wings need to forget about this and move to game 4.  Datsyuk, and Hossa really need to start scoring, or Babcock has to mix up the lines but losing game 4 would be horrible for the Wings chances.  Now, game aside hopefully Wisnieski has a speedy recovery, taking off on a strecher is scary, and their is no u pdate on what happend to him, other then he is in stable condition</p>
<p>A quick note on the Pheonix situation.  Balsillie made a bid to buy the team with a clause that they would be moved to Southern Ontario.  This is great for hockey, while I do support all teams, these lower market teams (Nashville, Pheonix, Florida etc.. ) are losing money and it makes sense to move them to a place where they make money.  In the past we have seen some teams get revitalized such as Chicago, Washington, Pittsburgh, and Tampa after they won the cup.  Saying that it&#8217;s best to weigh all the option, but the bottom line is Pheonix has fallen under and their is a dedicated owner willing to buy them and move them to a great market.  Balsillie learnt from his previous outings and used the bankruptcy court this time.  He is putting all the power in the courts hands, and the question is does the bankruptcy court have the right to dictate a move by an nhl franchise?  This situation will unfold thrusday as all parties are meeting to start discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/early-toughts-on-the-second-round-and-balsillie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 2 Predictions (East)</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions-east/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions-east/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 20:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crosby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ovechkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Capitals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pits Vs. Washington
This is the series everyone wants to see.  The classic showdown Crosby and Malkin against Ovechkin.  This series will most likely silence the critics, and ultimately pick who is the better player.  Also this series might play heavily into the Hart Trophy voting
Washington came back from a 3-1 deficit in round one to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pits Vs. Washington</p>
<p>This is the series everyone wants to see.  The classic showdown Crosby and Malkin against Ovechkin.  This series will most likely silence the critics, and ultimately pick who is the better player.  Also this series might play heavily into the Hart Trophy voting</p>
<p>Washington came back from a 3-1 deficit in round one to wrap up the series in 7 games.  Although this may seem as a feat it is not much.  The Rangers got lucky to push Washington that far.  In this series we need to see Ovechkin, Semin, Backstrom, and Green all play better.  Other then Ovechkins wonderful goal these 4 weren&#8217;t the difference makers they need to be to win this series.  Varlemov has to keep up his stellar play in this round, because the Caps got no other options in goal.</p>
<p>Crosby and Malkin have been firing on all cylinders, and are leading their team going into this second round.  Jordan Stall and Gonchar need to up the ante here.  Staal got a new contract but he needs to play like hes earned that new contract.  Also Gonchar was not playing as good as he can, while Letang was playing better then expected.  It seems Washington has the edge in goal, but don&#8217;t count out Fleury he has been here before and Varlemov hasent faced a real offence yet.</p>
<p>Prediction is Pens in 6 I think Varlemov will cave under the Pens offence, and Fleury will pick up his game</p>
<p>Boston Vs. Carolina</p>
<p>Little to say here I think Boston is the clear favorite,  Carolina spoiled New Jerseys party last round.  This in my opinion was a little bit of a fluke but Staal and Whitney arent enough to take down the Boston&#8217;s depth Chart.</p>
<p>Boston in 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions-east/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NHL Playoff 2009 Round 2 Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-playoff-2009-round-2-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-playoff-2009-round-2-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tatum</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Canucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ROUND 2 Predictions
 
Boston(1) vs. Carolina(6)
A maybe too well rested Boston squad faces off against Carolina, a team who should most probably be weary after knocking off the Devils in what I thought was a bit more than a slight upset. There are only two main hypotheses that come to mind in this case. Boston [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>ROUND 2 Predictions</em></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong> </strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Boston</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(1) vs. Carolina(6)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A maybe too well rested Boston squad faces off against Carolina, a team who should most probably be weary after knocking off the Devils in what I thought was a bit more than a slight upset. There are only two main hypotheses that come to mind in this case. Boston will take some time to get back into the rhythm of things while Carolina will struggle to keep up the pace as the series lengthens. On that fact alone, I’d have to give the series to Boston, but seeing as how it’s the eastern conference leading Bruins up against the Canes, I can’t see this going any farther than 5 games.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Boston in 5</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/A4ft20DYGx4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/A4ft20DYGx4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0xe1600f&amp;color2=0xfebd01" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Washington</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(2) vs. Pittsburgh(4)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">As much as I enjoyed the Washington comeback in the previous round, I doubt that run will continue into the second round. Pittsburgh simply won’t provide the Capitals with the same comeback opportunities that a weak Rangers team did in round one. The only way I could see the Capitals making it to the next round is with outstanding backing by Varlamov to counter a strong Penguins offense, which seems unlikely as they go further into the playoffs considering his lack of experience.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Pittsburgh in 6</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Detroit</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(2) vs. Anaheim(8)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m not saying that Anaheim’s victory in the first round was anything less than what it was, but I’m sure San Jose would have found a way to lose against any team they played. This seemed like a fairly straight-forward prediction in Detroit. Between the play-off experience and steady goaltending Detroit should be able to pull through without too many problems. That being said, I do expect a Detroit hick-up sometime this series. It just seems to happen almost every year. So with that and Hiller possibly stealing a game or two, I expect this series to make it to 6 games.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Detroit in 6</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Vancouver</span><span style="text-decoration: underline;">(3) vs. Chicago(4)</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="text-decoration: none;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hmmm…So here’s the tough decision. Do I go with a tough, emotional Canucks team who have a strong defensive presence centered around arguably, the best goaltender currently in the game, or do I go with a young, up and coming Hawks team with a lot of talent, who is quickly making a name for themselves this playoff season. For me this comes down directly between Chicago’s pipes. Will we see the “Bulin Wall”? I don’t think we will and that’s why I ultimately have to go with Vancouver. Either way, I think this is bound to be an exciting series which will most likely flip-flop in terms of wins.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Prediction: Vancouver in 7</strong></p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o7WAY9n578U&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o7WAY9n578U&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/nhl-playoff-2009-round-2-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bet on Round 2 of NHL Playoffs</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/bet-on-round-2-of-nhl-playoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/bet-on-round-2-of-nhl-playoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bookmaker.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Odds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sportsbetting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=70</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All of the lines for round 2 of the NHL playoffs are in at Bookmaker.com.
The Blackhawks vs Canucks series that starts tonight is supposed to be a close one.  The odds are as follows:
Blackhawks +120
Canucks -140
Bet the Blackhawks here.  The Hawks have at least a 50% chance to win the series, so get your money [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the lines for round 2 of the NHL playoffs are in at Bookmaker.com.</p>
<p>The Blackhawks vs Canucks series that starts tonight is supposed to be a close one.  The odds are as follows:</p>
<p>Blackhawks +120<br />
Canucks -140</p>
<p><strong>Bet the Blackhawks</strong> here.  The Hawks have at least a 50% chance to win the series, so get your money in with the good odds and hope for the best.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, the Ducks vs Red Wings series has the biggest spread.</p>
<p>Ducks +250<br />
Red Wings -300</p>
<p><strong>Don&#8217;t bet on this series.</strong> The odds are pretty dead on in my opinion and it would be negative expected value to bet on either team with those odds.</p>
<p>The Bruins vs Canes series is a much small spread on Bookmaker.com than I was expecting.</p>
<p>Hurricanes +185<br />
Bruins -215</p>
<p><strong>Bet the Bruins in this series.</strong> In my opinion this series is the most one sided and since it&#8217;s not the most one sided in terms of the betting you should take advantage and bet on the Bruins.  I would be very surprised if the Bruins don&#8217;t win and I think you are getting a very good return on this almost sure bet.</p>
<p>Of course the closest series price is the Crosby vs Ovechkin show.</p>
<p>Penguins +100<br />
Capitals -120</p>
<p><strong>Bet the Penguins in this series.</strong> I am very surprised that the Pens are labeled as the underdog by the sports books.  Most people I have talked to say the Pens are sure to win.  I&#8217;d give the Pens about 60% to win and this percentage makes taking the Penguins here a good bet.</p>
<p>*If you don&#8217;t have an account at <a href="http://www.bookmaker.com/?cmpid=9808">Bookmaker.com</a>, sign up using <a href="http://bookmakercombonuscode.com">Bookmaker.com bonus code</a> &#8220;<strong>BMBONUS</strong>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/bet-on-round-2-of-nhl-playoffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 2 Predictions (West)</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions-west/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions-west/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anaheim Vs.  Detroit
I am highly biased in favor of the Wings, but I will do my best to be neutral in this one.  Anaheim&#8217;s got a hot goalie going into this round.  Hiller has played well agaisnt a powerful Sharks offence, the questions is can he keep this up against the Wings.  While the Sharks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anaheim Vs.  Detroit</strong></p>
<p>I am highly biased in favor of the Wings, but I will do my best to be neutral in this one.  Anaheim&#8217;s got a hot goalie going into this round.  Hiller has played well agaisnt a powerful Sharks offence, the questions is can he keep this up against the Wings.  While the Sharks were a deep team, the Wings are deeper.  As brought out on Tsn last night Hudler and Holmstrom are two of the highest scoring players for their amount of ice time (16 Mins).  In the first round the elite players from the wings Datsyuk (2Pts), Zetterberg (4Pts), and Hossa (4Pts) barely shown what they could accomplish, watch for an emergence in this round.  On the back end Stuart and Kronwall have been playing like first tandum defensemen, while Lindstrom and Rafalski need to step it up.  The wild card in all this is Osgood, can he keep up the play that he has shown against Columbus or not.</p>
<p>Anaheim has spoiled Detroits playoff party in the past to avoid this , the ducks the trio of Getzlaf, Ryan, and Perry have been on fire and are going to have to be contained by the Wings.  Home ice advantage is key as Babcock can put Selke winner and nominee Datsyuk against the top line or go with Selke Nominee Zetterberg&#8217;s line.  Either way the Ducks will have to rely heavily on the presence of Pronger (If he could play disciplined) and Niedermayer.  It is also unfair to underestimate the importance of Beauchemain, and Whitney in this series.  Whitney was aquired for Kunitz at the trade deadline and needs to step up his game to show he was worth it.</p>
<p><strong>Prediction Wings in 6.</strong> The Wings look too good and are too dominant to lose this series, I took them all the way to the cup so we will see how this plays out.</p>
<p><strong>Chicago Vs. Vancouver</strong></p>
<p>Lets not forget the history these two teams have.  A end of the season brawl in march  between these two teams saw over 80 minutes of penalties given out in one minute.  Leading the way was a good tilt between Bieksa and Eager.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/HmfLGtxsjAE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/HmfLGtxsjAE&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>People say that their is no fighting in the playoffs, well this year they are wrong.  This year the playoffs have had everything and don&#8217;t expect that to stop tonight when the puck drops in this series.</p>
<p>Vancover&#8217;s Luongo has had a stellar series against the Blues, but this series looks to be tougher with all of Chicagos line&#8217;s firing it will be a close goaltending battle between him and the Bulin Wall.  The Wall has the experiance and a ring so don&#8217;t put him behind Luongo in this series.  The forwards from the Canucks got off the first round easy.  The Sedins haven&#8217;t stepped up to this level yet so they need to be even better this round, also where have Sundin and Demitra been.  Sundin was  brought in halfway through the season and hasn&#8217;t done much, Demitra started off the season hot but has slowed down.  These two need to pick it up to win this round.  Seabrook and Keith have been the best defensive paring in these playoffs, Bieksa, Ohlund, and Salo will have to work hard to shut down all of the Blackhawks lines</p>
<p><strong>I give the edge to Chicago in this one they will take it in 6.</strong> This series will be the most physical of the second round, expect fireworks</p>
<p>Eastern Conferance preview tommorow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions-west/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round One Recap</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-one-recap/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-one-recap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Playoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Round 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[San Jose Vs. Anaheim
The best player in this series was no doubt Hiller, followed closely by Getzlaf.  The sharks have been favored for years to advance far into the stanley cup playoffs, nothing change this year.  After being out scored, out hit, and out goaltendended again in the playoffs Thorton and Marleau&#8217;s leadership abilities have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>San Jose Vs. Anaheim</p>
<p>The best player in this series was no doubt Hiller, followed closely by Getzlaf.  The sharks have been favored for years to advance far into the stanley cup playoffs, nothing change this year.  After being out scored, out hit, and out goaltendended again in the playoffs Thorton and Marleau&#8217;s leadership abilities have come into question.  Their are even rumours swirling that Marleau and\or Thorton are on the out&#8217;s from San Jose.  Enough about San Jose, lets talk bout the winners.  The top line from the Ducks featuring Ryan, Getzlaf, and Perry played amazing, arguably one of the best in the first series.  Niedermayer led the way on defence, and Pronger had a great series.  We must not forget about hte efforts of Beauchemain, and Wisneski.  I Called San Jose in this series, but this is the last time I bank on San Jose</p>
<p>Detroit Vs. Columbus</p>
<p>Best player in the series was Osgood, showing why hes one of the best playoff goalies of our generation.  There isnt much to write about this series.  No one took Columbus as a threat and the Wings just mowed over the Blue Jackets.  I called this series correctly, but then again who didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Vancover Vs. St-Louis</p>
<p>Best player in this series was Luongo.  Once again no surprises here, even though the Blues were the hottest team going into the playoffs, Vancover was superior on paper, and that translated nicely onto the ice.  A physical series that didn&#8217;t last very long.  I called this series correctly.</p>
<p>Chicago Vs. Calgary</p>
<p>By far the best series in the west, with the best player being Seabrook.  Seabrook is now the highest scoring defensemen in the playoffs played a good shut-down role alongside Keith and really gave it to Igilna, who was mediocore, at best in this series.  This series has intense physical battles, Byfuglien, Burrish played their roles perfectly.  Byfuglien was a force all series even scoring goals, and being a good finess player (See his play in the last game where he circled Leopold).  Toews played great in his frist series, but Kane, Jokinen, and Cammaleri weren&#8217;t anything amazing but nevertheless fun to watch.  I took Chicago in this series.</p>
<p>Boston Vs. Montreal</p>
<p>Its hard to pick a best player in this Series I will give the award to Kessel, Savard, Chara, and Ryder.  It&#8217;s hard to say anything positive about this series Montreal centenial season was plagued with downs, and this series was another one of those downs.  Boston played a physical game and this took its toll on the Habs and threw them off their game. Like everyone else I took Boston in this series</p>
<p>Washington Vs. Rangers</p>
<p>Varlemov was probably the best player in this series, but facing a low scoring Rangers offence can make any goalie look good.  The star players from the Capitals didnt play particularily good, but luckily neither did the Ranger&#8217;s.  I tookl the Rangers to win this series for one reason.  I didnt think a team backstopped by Theodore could win a series, and I was technically right, but I know now to not overestimate the ranger.  Lundquist could steal a game or two b ut not 4.</p>
<p>New Jersey Vs. Carolina</p>
<p>You have to say Stall was the best player in this series.  What an end to game 7, kudos to the Canes for not quitting.  I expected alot more from the Devils after a terrific season without Brodeur, but I guess even Brodeur couldnt prevent Gleason from making that amazing play to keep the puck alive in the final minutes of game 7.  I took New Jersey in this series, but I would still do the same pick, and don&#8217;t regret it.</p>
<p>Pittsburg Vs. Philidelpia</p>
<p>The best players in this series was Crosby and Malkin.  Another tough chapter in the battle of Pensylvania once again the Pens come out as victors.  I would have liked to see more of Gonchar in this series, not just Gonchar, but also all of the Pittsburg defense squad wasent too engaged in the series.  The Flyers put up a good fight but their highest paid player in Briere wasn&#8217;t anywhere to be found.  Also, nice to see Giroux stand up and show how good of a player he actually is. I called Pittsburg to win this series.</p>
<p>Round Two Predictions to come</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-one-recap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s got Hart?</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/whos-got-hart/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/whos-got-hart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jizzm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the final three nominees for this year&#8217;s Hart Trophy (aka MVP) award were announced. This award is meant to be awarded to the &#8221;player adjudged most valuable to his team&#8221;. The three nominees are Evgeni Malkin, Alexander Ovechkin, and Pavel Datsyuk. A case could easily be made for any of these three talented forwards.
Pavel Datsyuk
Datsyuk may [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the final three nominees for this year&#8217;s Hart Trophy (aka MVP) award were announced. This award is meant to be awarded to the &#8221;player adjudged most valuable to his team&#8221;. The three nominees are Evgeni Malkin, Alexander Ovechkin, and Pavel Datsyuk. A case could easily be made for any of these three talented forwards.</p>
<p><strong>Pavel Datsyuk</strong></p>
<p>Datsyuk may not quite be at the top with Malkin and Ovechkin when it comes to points, but for the second year in a row, he is up for the Selke trophy (best defensive forward). Being as good as he is defensively may not put quite as many fans in the stands but it is very valuable to any successfuly team. On top of being one of the top forwards defensively, he also has undeniably amazing skills, and he did get 97 points which is notable on its own. The only downside to Datsyuk for the Hart is that he has an amazing team, therefore it is arguable that they could be good even without this all-around all-star.</p>
<p><strong>Evgeni Malkin</strong></p>
<p>This young star has been shadowed since his arrival by the presence of Crosby, but this year he has emerged and shown that he can be just as good if not better than Sid the Kid. He lead the league in points this year, and led his team back from a shaky start into the fourth spot in the Eastern conference and also past the Flyers in round 1. The problem that i see with giving Malkin the Hart is much the same one as giving it to Datsyuk, I mean he is on the same team as Sid, and either of these guys could easily be called the best in the game, so how do you say that they were the most valuable to any single team?</p>
<p><strong>Alexander Ovechkin</strong></p>
<p>Last but not least, Alex the Great. This guy is my personal nominee. Once again he has lead the league in goals scored in a season, only this time he missed the points title by 3. My arguments for both of the other players were the same, and you could say the same about Ovi and the Caps. Ovechkin had the help of Semin, Green, and Backstrom to get his team to 2nd place. I think the difference is that every year, the Caps exceed expectations, and I believe that Ovechkin has a lot to do with that. Who expected Washington to finish 2nd in the East? I sure didn&#8217;t. You can&#8217;t say the same for the likes of Detroit or Pittsburgh, both these teams won their conferences last year, and had minimal losses last offseason (except for Hossa going from one to the other). But the Caps exceeded expectations this season, and i think that is the deciding factor, Ovi did the most with the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/whos-got-hart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 2 Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jizzm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Detroit vs. Anaheim
Wings in 7. Yes the ducks did just knock off this season&#8217;s arguable favourite for the cup, but let&#8217;s be real, how many years in a row has SJ been favoured? They have managed to disappoint every year which is why I am not surprised that they are already gone. The reason I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Detroit vs. Anaheim</strong></p>
<p>Wings in 7. Yes the ducks did just knock off this season&#8217;s arguable favourite for the cup, but let&#8217;s be real, how many years in a row has SJ been favoured? They have managed to disappoint every year which is why I am not surprised that they are already gone. The reason I am giving the Ducks enough respect to last until game 7 is because of their young tender Jonas Hiller. He managed to keep the Sharks, a team with 257 goals in 82 games during the reg season, down to 10 goals in 6 playoff games with a GAA of 1.64 and a sv% of .957. Although these numbers are impressive, we also witnessed the Red Wings put 18 goals in the net in only 4 games, and every goal went past probable rookie of the year and potential Vezina winner Steve Mason. This series may very well be over before game 7, but Anaheim has a very tough and young core that could potentially do some damage away from Jos Louis arena.</p>
<p><strong>Vancouver vs. Chicago</strong></p>
<p>Canucks in 6. This series is shaping up to be your classic gaoltender&#8217;s duel. On one side you have a goalie with a stanley cup in Khabibulin who seems to give his team a chance to win every night. On the other side you have arguably the league&#8217;s best goaltender in Luongo who also has the best GAA and sv% this postseason. Both these goalies could very well win this series for their respective teams, so i think the determining factor in the series will be the Canuck&#8217;s very tough defensive core matching up against the inexperienced and young offense of the &#8216;Hawks.</p>
<p><strong>Boston vs. Carolina</strong></p>
<p>Bruins in 5. This series is a strange one that is difficult for me to make any predictions on. I just cannot see how the Canes keep winning, I think that the stanley cup run they made back in 05/06 is the reason they keep surprising me. Their best player by far is Eric Staal, and Cam Ward has been solid in net as he has proven he can be in the past. After Staal and Ray Whitney there is a large drop-off in skilled offensive players. you could make cases for both Brind&#8217;Amour and Samsonov, but both seem to have reached their peak years ago. The Bruins have the perfect mix of veterans and skilled young&#8217;ns between Savard, Recchi, and Ryder, Krejci, Lucic, and Kessel. They also have a goalie that has proven through this season that he can be just as good if not better than Ward in Tim Thomas.</p>
<p><strong>Washington vs. Pittsburgh</strong></p>
<p>Pens in 7. The pens could easily end this series quickly, but i think it is more of a hope than an actual prediction for a game 7. This series has been a long time in the making, Sid the Kid vs. Alexander the Great. Who wouldn&#8217;t want this series to go to 7? Personally i am a big Ovechkin fan so I am rooting for the Caps, but i don&#8217;t see how they could beat the Pens. Pens win the tender battle hands down, and I won&#8217;t change my mind until Varlamov can prove himself. Fleury has been slightly unstable in the past, but for the most part has proven himself, including proving that he can bring the Pens to the cup finals. There is no reason why Fleury should fall apart when facing the Caps offense, he has faced offenses that are just as good if not better than the Caps in Philly this year and the Sens last year without giving in. If the Caps hope to surpass the Pens, they will need solid goaltending once again from Varlamov and they will need the core of their firepower, Ovi, Semin, Kozlov, Laich etc. to keep producing, and maybe even take it one step further.</p>
<p>Stanley Cup Winners: Detroit Red Wings. There are my predictions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-2-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Round 1</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jizzm</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round 1 was an action-packed round full of everything from upsets (Anaheim over SJ) to expected sweeps (Boston over Habs) to 7 game series with unbelievable endings (Carolina over NJ), from coach-fan altercations (Tortorella) to fights between two all-stars (Thornton vs. Getzlaf). As a hockey fan I am thoroughly satisfied with round 1, i just hope [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round 1 was an action-packed round full of everything from upsets (Anaheim over SJ) to expected sweeps (Boston over Habs) to 7 game series with unbelievable endings (Carolina over NJ), from coach-fan altercations (Tortorella) to fights between two all-stars (Thornton vs. Getzlaf). As a hockey fan I am thoroughly satisfied with round 1, i just hope round 2 can provide as much excitement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/round-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Einzers predictions for Round 2</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/einzers-predictions-for-round-2/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/einzers-predictions-for-round-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Einz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Thursday the beginning of Round 2 of the Stanley cup playoffs is starting. Some pretty interesting matchups. Ofcourse all eyes are going to be on the Pit/Wsh series. Its the Crosby vs Ovechkin show. I should probably include Malkin, but I&#8217;m not going to. Why? It doesn&#8217;t seem to matter how much he does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday the beginning of Round 2 of the Stanley cup playoffs is starting. Some pretty interesting matchups. Ofcourse all eyes are going to be on the Pit/Wsh series. Its the Crosby vs Ovechkin show. I should probably include Malkin, but I&#8217;m not going to. Why? It doesn&#8217;t seem to matter how much he does he does not get the respect and attention Crosby does. Kinda odd, but oh well.</p>
<p>Anyways here&#8217;s my predictions for the first round:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Detroit(2) vs Anaheim(8)</span></p>
<p>Alright, now this is going to be my upset for this round. Everyone is counting Anaheim out, so I&#8217;m going to take the underdog. Anaheims top line looked incredible against the sharks. Ryan, Perry, and Getzlaf do so many things right at both ends of the ice. In the offensive zone, they are going to have to tire out that Detroit defence that has&#8217;t looked as promising this year. They need to cycle it and keep the puck down low, and crash the net hard when they get opportunities. Osgood is by far the worst goalie left in these playoffs (he won his cups infront of an always amazing detroit team). As for Detroit, they just need to keep doing what they do. Try to keep puck possession and get screens infront of Hiller. Hiller is the real deal, and they are going to have to get some quality chances to score, he&#8217;s not letting any softies by. And with that I think if Anaheim gets they&#8217;re big line rolling, and gets a couple bounces their way, there is no reason why they can&#8217;t win this series.</p>
<p><strong>Ducks in 7</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Vancouver(3) vs Chicago(4)</span></p>
<p>A hot St. Louis team came into Vancouver thinking they had a chance. Luongo and the Canucks shut that thought down pretty quick. The hottest team the second half of the year was dominated by a bigger, better squad. The Nucks are all you can ask for in a team, they have speed, skill,grit,size and they all play with emotion. Did I mention Luongo? Vancouver needs to get their physical game right where it was in the first series. They need to be hammering guys like Toews, Kane, Sharp, and yes, Havlat! Havlat is probably the biggest threat to the Nucks. Shut him down and they will be fine. That hard hitting defence of Vancouver needs to be all over these guys. If the  Hawks want this series, they are going to need more of the production they have been getting from their defence. Barker has been incredible on the PP. He needs to keep it up.  Campbell is going to have to produce. The Chicago forwards are going to be in tough against the big Vancouver defence, and if Chicago doesn&#8217;t get some points from their D, they aren&#8217;t going to have a shot at this series. Chicago will steal a couple with their PP, but Van is going to take the series.</p>
<p><strong>Nucks in 6</strong></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Boston(1) vs Carolina(6)</span></p>
<p>Carolina just wrapped up a nice series with the Devils. Probably my favorite series. The Canes pulled through, like I thought they would. As for the 2nd round, I think their little run has come to an end. Really the only thing keeping the Canes alive is the Staal/ Whitney line, and lets not forget Cam Ward. But you need more than 3 players to make it far in the playoffs. The Bruins just have too much firepore along with a great defence, and again, lets not forget Tim Thomas (Vezina candidate). Chara and friends will need to shut down that first line of Carolina, and they will be fine. Expect Lucic to have a big physical impact like always. With that Bruin offence, I see this series ending quickly. Bruins will be almost perfect!</p>
<p><strong>Bruins in 5</strong></p>
<p>Washington(2) vs Pittsburgh(4)</p>
<p>This is the series everyone was waiting for. Well here it is. Just about the 2 best powerplays (on paper) in the league. Washington had a lot of trouble with NYR in the first round, and I&#8217;m really not sure why? Theodore definetly blew a game, but other than that, they just had trouble beating Lundqvist. Even though Ovechkin finished with 7 points, he was not spectacular by any means. 2 of his goals were meaningless, as the scores were already 4-1 and 3-0. He did not come in the clutch. Ovechkin needs more discipline. He needs to get pucks deep instead of trying to bolt through the whole team himself(Yes that one goal against NYR was amazing but cmon).  He will need to be much better if they want a chance at beating Pit. As for the rookie goalie Simeon Varlamov, he is going to get tested much more against the highly skilled Pittsburgh offence. He will need to be on his game. The Penguins will need to keep getting contributions from the big 2. Aside from that, the team needs to play a good defensive game. With highly skilled guys like Ovy, Semin and Backstrom.. the Pit D are going to have their hands full. The forwards are going to have to be coming back hard to prevent odd man rushes. This is going to be the most exciting series because of the rivalries Crosby, Malkin, Ovechkin, Semin had during the regular season. Definitly expect big ovy to be taking some runs at Crosby. This is going to go back and forth all series. Ovechkin will need to bring that high level on energy he has, but try not to get too hyped up. Sometimes he makes bad decisions when he&#8217;s on his tear. Look for Crosby to be the same composed, and highly competitive individual. On another note, it&#8217;s going to be interesting to see who outperforms who in the Gonchar/Green offensive-d man rivalry. I&#8217;m going to say with his experience, Gonchar, and with that, I think the Penguins will take it in 6.</p>
<p><strong>Pens in 6</strong></p>
<p>Alright well this should be an entertaining second round, so grab your beers and make your bets.</p>
<p>Cheers, Einz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/einzers-predictions-for-round-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Woohoo Round 2 Predictions</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/woohoo-round-2-predictions/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/woohoo-round-2-predictions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anaheim Ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pittsburgh Penguins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver Canucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Capitals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Round 1 is finished and round 2 is just around the corner.  This means it&#8217;s prediction time.  Last round I went 8 for 8 so listen up folks for some prediction gold.
Canucks (3) vs Blackhawks (4)
Me and Einz just made a bet on this series last night.  I have the Hawks in 6 and he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round 1 is finished and round 2 is just around the corner.  This means it&#8217;s prediction time.  Last round I went 8 for 8 so listen up folks for some prediction gold.</p>
<p>Canucks (3) vs Blackhawks (4)</p>
<p>Me and Einz just made a bet on this series last night.  I have the Hawks in 6 and he has the Canucks in 6.  Bet gets doubled if the game guess is correct.</p>
<p>I may be slightly biased in this choice because the Blackhawks are my favourite team in the playoffs and Martin Havlat is my favourite player, but I truly believe that the Hawks will pull it out.  They are a solid team throughout.  When you look at the fact that Pahlsson and Byfuglien led the forwards in time on ice in the close out game against Calgary you see just how deep the Blackhawks are.  The question mark is of course goaltending.  Can the Hawks find a way to score on Luongo.  I think the answer is yes.  If Khabibulin can play a solid series the Hawks will win.</p>
<p><strong>Blackhawks in 6</strong></p>
<p>Red Wings (2) vs Ducks (8)</p>
<p>I took the Ducks over the Sharks in the first round, but I can&#8217;t see a repeat performance in the books.  I have a lot more respect for the Red Wings team and I feel they will easily be able to dispatch the Ducks.  Hiller isn&#8217;t going to be able to shut down all the Red Wing weapons.  The Ducks do have the edge in goal, but I feel that is their only edge and it&#8217;s not a big enough one to make a real difference in the series.  The Wings will just keep coming at Hiller hard and with more purpose in their shots than the ones he was facing against San Jose.</p>
<p><strong>Red Wings in 5</strong></p>
<p>Bruins (1) vs Hurricanes (6)</p>
<p>Carolina put together a great last minute in their series against New Jersey, scoring the tieing and winning goals a few minutes apart.  They will need to play like that all game everygame to beat Boston.  The Bruins are just heads and shoulders above everyone else in the East this year.  The WhatIf Sports simulation had the Bruins with an over 75% chance to make the conference finals.  I have to agree.  Ward may steal a game or two for the Canes, but it won&#8217;t be enough.</p>
<p><strong>Bruins in 6</strong></p>
<p>Capitals (2) vs Penguins (4)</p>
<p>The Capitals put together a valiant effort last round becoming the first team since the 2004 Montreal Canadiens to come back and win a series after being down 3-1.  Ok, let&#8217;s get serious, it wasn&#8217;t that impressive because the New York Rangers were not a solid team.  The Capitals did not look good in game 7 and Ovechkin has not been playing well at all.  The over the blueline shots Ovechkin is taking and trying to score on a 1 on 4 instead of just dumping the puck in is hurting the Capitals and unlike the Rangers, the Penguins actually have the firepower to make Ovechkin and the Caps play.  No doubt this will be the most exciting serious with the Ovechkin/Semin vs Malkin/Crosby rivalry sure to heat up.</p>
<p><strong>Penguins in 7</strong></p>
<p>So there are my predictions.  Also known as my <a href="http://hockeyopinions.com">hockey opinions</a>.  Place your bets for the series&#8217; at Bookmaker.com.  Use <a href="http://bookmakercombonuscode.com">Bookmaker.com bonus code</a> &#8216;BMBONUS&#8217; when signing up to get a 100% matching bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/woohoo-round-2-predictions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playoffs: Rapping up the first round</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/playoffs-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/playoffs-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Einz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marleau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nabokov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose Sharks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Staal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thornton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the first round there is not that much that can be said. How big of an upset was Anaheim beating San Jose? We all knew it could happen, we were just hoping for the Sharks to pull through this time. Atleast I was (My pools are in trouble). Washington had a scare, but most [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the first round there is not that much that can be said. How big of an upset was Anaheim beating San Jose? We all knew it could happen, we were just hoping for the Sharks to pull through this time. Atleast I was (My pools are in trouble). Washington had a scare, but most of us figured they would get through the first round.  Philly looked like they were going to turn the series around, but Crosby and Malkin weren&#8217;t going to let that happen. Without Reghyr, Chicago&#8217;s speedy forwards didn&#8217;t have to worry about being punished. As for Detroit, Vancouver, and Boston&#8230; well lets just say the series went the way everyone thought they would.  The only real catcher was the Carolina-New Jersey series. How amazing was that? One goal games back and forth (excluding game six).</p>
<p>The Sharks struck out bigtime again. How long is GM Doug Wilson going to let this happen? ITS TIME FOR A CHANGE. Who&#8217;s to go? Is it Thorton or Marleau.. or is one player just not the answer. The sharks have a solid foundation. There&#8217;s no need to restructure. I think it&#8217;s time Nabakov is given the boot. He&#8217;s been riding win after win playing infront of an amazing Sharks team. While him and Toskala were playing together the Sharks finished with 107 points. Any goalie playing infront of that team could get the credit that nabakov has. I think its time for the sharks to either trade for a true winner between the pipes, or draft a solid keeper. This way they will have a good shot at the cup in a couple of years. But now that theyre out of the playoffs, a minus on the scoreboard won&#8217;t look so bad.</p>
<p>As Pierre McGuire would say .. Staal, Whitney, and especially Cam Ward were MONSTERS in this series. Carolina looked like the old stanley cup champs in game 7. As me and my buddies were watching (just after exams so we were loaded) &#8230; we knew that the game wasn&#8217;t just over yet. In the last 5 minutes Carolina just kept pushing and pushing. Finally Jussi Jokinen (who is not just a shootout specialist anymore) came through in the clutch scoring a goal on a beautiful pass from Pitkanen to tie it up.  A minute later Staal put the icing on the series with a pretty weak goal.  But you can&#8217;t blame Brodeur.. He was phenomenal. I remember counting the shots from games 4-5-6.. it was 127!! Thats averaging over 42 shots per game.. which is just nuts. Brodeur was pooped. If you looked and Lundqvist in the NYR he was tired and didn&#8217;t even have close to that many shots. Carolina was just to strong and Paul Maurice had a good strategy in place.. GET PUCKS TO THE NET.  Well it worked.</p>
<p>Anyways its 340 in the morning and ive had a couple too many sodas&#8230;  So have a good night  ladies n gents</p>
<p>Einz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/playoffs-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>8 for 8 in the First Round of the NHL Playoffs</title>
		<link>http://hockeyopinions.com/8-for-8-in-the-first-round-of-the-nhl-playoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://hockeyopinions.com/8-for-8-in-the-first-round-of-the-nhl-playoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Niko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hockey Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anaheim Ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bruins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Hurricanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Blackhawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit Red Wings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie the Monkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey Devils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose Sharks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hockeyopinions.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am the man.  I own the NHL.  It&#8217;s like I went into the future and saw what was going to happen in the first round of the NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs and predicted exactly what was happening.  I had Anaheim.   I had Carolina.  I had all the upsets and all the favourites.  Everyone who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the man.  I own the NHL.  It&#8217;s like I went into the future and saw what was going to happen in the first round of the NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs and predicted exactly what was happening.  I had Anaheim.   I had Carolina.  I had all the upsets and all the favourites.  Everyone who won was my team.  I own.  Now let me tell you why.</p>
<p>First of all Anaheim.  In my bracket with my buddies there were 7 entries and I was the only one who took Anaheim over SJ.  I like to look at recent games in the season to predict what is going on in the playoffs.  San Jose was 17 wins and 19 losses in their last 36 games.  That&#8217;s brutal when you consider they are a presidents trophy, first place in the NHL team.  Let&#8217;s compare this to the Ducks who were 10 wins and 3 losses in their last 13.  Who do you think has the momentum going into the playoffs.</p>
<p>Sure, Hiller played his ass off and the stats would show that San Jose outplayed Anaheim throughout the series.  San Jose&#8217;s shots were often from non threatening positions and even though Hiller did play amazing he was not the difference in the series.  Anaheim played solid defensively keeping most of the Sharks chances to the outside.  The Ducks even only needed 1 line, of Ryan, Perry and Getzlaf, to score enough goals to win the series.  The stars of the Ducks stepped up, which includes the line mentioned above, as well as Niedermayer and Pronger.  The stars of the Ducks outplayed the stars of the Sharks and that was the difference in the series.  Don&#8217;t expect the Ducks to have much chance next round against the high octane offense of the Detroit Red Wings, because the Red Wings, unlike the Sharks, actually have weapons at their disposal.</p>
<p>Same thing goes for my other underdog pick the Canes.  8 and 2 in their last 10 compared to New Jerseys 4 and 6.  I also felt that Ward would outplay Brodeur.  This last piece of the puzzle didn&#8217;t come together until Brodeur was unable to hold the 2-1 lead with about 2 minutes left in the third period of game 7.  For such a supposedly &#8220;clutch&#8221; goaltender Brodeur really dropped the ball against the Canes.  Two goals in the last few minutes of a seventh game to drop the series is pretty disappointing no matter who you are.  Maybe Brodeur needed to freak out at the end of game 6 and throw his stick a bit to ensure he came to play in game 7.  Brodeur is an overrated goalie who in my opinion does not deserve the respect he has accumulated over his many years in the league.</p>
<p>For those of you who are interested, or for those of you who want to profit off of my knowledge, my picks for next round are Boston, Pittsburgh, Detroit and Chicago.  I&#8217;m 8 for 8 so far and only 7 series left to go.  If you are interested in betting you should check out bookmaker.com and use <a href="http://bookmakercombonuscode.com">Bookmaker.com bonus code</a> &#8216;BMBONUS&#8217; when signing up to receive your bonus.  I&#8217;m planning to go 15 for 15 and if I do, I expect to take Maggie the Monkeys job at TSN.</p>
<p>Also, for those of you who care, I am in a solid position in the bracket pool with my buddies after going 8 for 8.  The next closest is Davey who went  7 for 8, but since he has SJ winning the cup he&#8217;s hard pressed to take down the bracket.   Einz is the main competition at this point as he had 6 of 8 right from the first round.  Jizzm was a donkey and took PHI to the finals so he is out.  It should be an interesting rest of the playoffs.  Stay tuned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hockeyopinions.com/8-for-8-in-the-first-round-of-the-nhl-playoffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
